ASA - September 2005 By Thread
488 messages
:
Starting
Thu Sep 01 2005 - 03:09:14 EDT,
Ending
Fri Sep 30 2005 - 14:14:58 EDT
sort by
: [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
] [
attachment
]
Nearby
: [
Other mail archives
]
lectures relating to Re: It's the Bible or evolution
David C Campbell
(Wed Sep 28 2005 - 11:19:44 EDT)
(no subject)
Michael Roberts
(Tue Sep 27 2005 - 13:53:27 EDT)
Fw: regarding your article
Robert Schneider
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 16:36:07 EDT)
Re: regarding your article
Michael Roberts
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 16:58:01 EDT)
Re: regarding your article
Robert Schneider
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 23:45:58 EDT)
Why Politicized Science is Dangerous
janice matchett
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 13:24:16 EDT)
Article on two books in latest PSCF
Bill Hamilton
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 08:32:47 EDT)
Re: Article on two books in latest PSCF
Charles Carrigan
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 15:18:03 EDT)
Cognitive dissonance
Glenn Morton
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 08:23:56 EDT)
Re: Cognitive dissonance
Michael Roberts
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 08:39:51 EDT)
When Giving Becomes Cruel
Glenn Morton
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 08:06:31 EDT)
It's the Bible or evolution
Keith Miller
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 00:18:21 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Cornelius Hunter
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 12:06:31 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Keith Miller
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 14:35:48 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Cornelius Hunter
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 21:11:44 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
kbmill@ksu.edu
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 14:23:07 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Cornelius Hunter
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 16:25:00 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Michael Roberts
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 17:01:17 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Cornelius Hunter
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 18:19:03 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Keith Miller
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 17:55:43 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
George Murphy
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 18:04:18 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Randy Isaac
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 22:32:34 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Freeman, Louise Margaret
(Tue Sep 27 2005 - 14:17:23 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Cornelius Hunter
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 11:41:35 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Jim Armstrong
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 12:33:49 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Cornelius Hunter
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 16:19:20 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Michael Roberts
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 17:51:31 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Jim Armstrong
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 20:52:11 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Terry M. Gray
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 22:46:47 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Dick Fischer
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 11:56:42 EDT)
DNA sequence space
Pim van Meurs
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 13:00:59 EDT)
Re: DNA sequence space
Cornelius Hunter
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 23:55:01 EDT)
Re: DNA sequence space
Terry M. Gray
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 01:13:16 EDT)
genetic code
Dr. David Campbell
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 13:50:06 EDT)
Re: DNA sequence space
Jim Armstrong
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 02:36:04 EDT)
Re: DNA sequence space
Dr. David Campbell
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 14:13:34 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Terry M. Gray
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 13:46:22 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Dick Fischer
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 14:00:59 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Randy Isaac
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 20:37:34 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Keith Miller
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 17:14:05 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Bill Hamilton
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 17:13:46 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Robert Schneider
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 17:27:37 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 18:31:30 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Pattle Pun
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 12:02:47 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Dick Fischer
(Tue Sep 27 2005 - 15:49:28 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
David C Campbell
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 12:42:21 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Ted Davis
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 18:55:25 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Ted Davis
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 20:52:25 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Alexanian, Moorad
(Tue Sep 27 2005 - 14:55:25 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Freeman, Louise Margaret
(Tue Sep 27 2005 - 16:09:36 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Alexanian, Moorad
(Tue Sep 27 2005 - 16:35:34 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Alexanian, Moorad
(Tue Sep 27 2005 - 16:59:44 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
David C Campbell
(Wed Sep 28 2005 - 18:45:01 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Alexanian, Moorad
(Wed Sep 28 2005 - 20:41:08 EDT)
question re Dover
Freeman, Louise Margaret
(Wed Sep 28 2005 - 22:02:39 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
David C Campbell
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 16:06:27 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Ted Davis
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 19:24:52 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Cornelius Hunter
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 19:42:30 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Pim van Meurs
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 22:24:11 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Randy Isaac
(Thu Sep 29 2005 - 21:04:10 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Ted Davis
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 08:49:16 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Denyse O'Leary
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 09:50:09 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
George Murphy
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 10:58:39 EDT)
Re: It's the Bible or evolution
Terry M. Gray
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 10:28:35 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Ted Davis
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 10:05:06 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Alexanian, Moorad
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 10:02:02 EDT)
RE: It's the Bible or evolution
Denyse O'Leary
(Fri Sep 30 2005 - 10:26:52 EDT)
Evolution of complexity
Pim van Meurs
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 20:37:33 EDT)
Re: Evolution of complexity
David C Campbell
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 12:04:58 EDT)
Peacocke's Tune
Gregory Arago
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 07:32:03 EDT)
Re: Peacocke's Tune
Michael Roberts
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 15:44:30 EDT)
Re: Peacocke's Tune
Robert Schneider
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 20:58:40 EDT)
On the science of everything
Alexanian, Moorad
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 16:08:51 EDT)
Re: On the science of everything
George Murphy
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 16:30:22 EDT)
Re: On the science of everything
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 17:16:53 EDT)
Re: On the science of everything
David C Campbell
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 11:15:17 EDT)
RE: On the science of everything
Alexanian, Moorad
(Tue Sep 27 2005 - 15:30:09 EDT)
Surprising diversity in bacteria genomes
Cornelius Hunter
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 10:48:47 EDT)
Re: Surprising diversity in bacteria genomes
David C Campbell
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 13:24:04 EDT)
Re: Surprising diversity in bacteria genomes
Pim van Meurs
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 21:16:39 EDT)
The greatest challenge facing mankind
janice matchett
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 09:06:29 EDT)
Re: The greatest challenge facing mankind
George Murphy
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 11:07:20 EDT)
Re: The greatest challenge facing mankind
janice matchett
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 12:48:27 EDT)
Re: The greatest challenge facing mankind
George Murphy
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 17:30:39 EDT)
Re: The greatest challenge facing mankind
janice matchett
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 18:44:05 EDT)
Re: The greatest challenge facing mankind
George Murphy
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 20:22:41 EDT)
Re: The greatest challenge facing mankind
Mccarrick, Alan D CIV NSWCCD Philadelphia, 9212
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 09:08:43 EDT)
Re: The greatest challenge facing mankind
Robert Schneider
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 10:23:16 EDT)
Re: The greatest challenge facing mankind
Michael Roberts
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 12:15:48 EDT)
Re: The greatest challenge facing mankind
Robert Schneider
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 16:34:27 EDT)
RE: Comments on Snoke's approach
Alexanian, Moorad
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 22:44:39 EDT)
Short point from Phil Skell
Ted Davis
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 13:31:53 EDT)
Article on two books in latest PSCF
Ted Davis
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 21:43:25 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Vernon Jenkins
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 19:17:33 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Randy Isaac
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 21:48:51 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Cornelius Hunter
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 23:22:28 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Pim van Meurs
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 11:07:17 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Randy Isaac
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 20:15:14 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Cornelius Hunter
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 10:23:17 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Pim van Meurs
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 12:33:53 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Cornelius Hunter
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 15:08:00 EDT)
Evolvability and more
Pim van Meurs
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 16:11:14 EDT)
RE: Comments on Snoke's approach
Stephen J. Krogh, P.G.
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 17:05:54 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Robert Schneider
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 15:46:16 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Randy Isaac
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 20:54:50 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Iain Strachan
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 03:22:56 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Jim Armstrong
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 02:11:39 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Randy Isaac
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 08:11:50 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Pim van Meurs
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 12:38:50 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Iain Strachan
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 03:35:49 EDT)
LiveScience series on ID vs Evol
Phillip Jones
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 08:36:53 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Vernon Jenkins
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 17:46:26 EDT)
Re: Comments on Snoke's approach
Ted Davis
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 18:52:30 EDT)
Article on two books in latest PSCF
Ted Davis
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 12:55:49 EDT)
Re: Article on two books in latest PSCF
janice matchett
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 13:39:45 EDT)
Correction! Re: Article on two books in latest PSCF
janice matchett
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 14:19:32 EDT)
Re: Correction! Re: Article on two books in latest PSCF
Michael Roberts
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 18:02:31 EDT)
Phil Skell replies to David Campbell
Ted Davis
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 12:20:11 EDT)
Re: Phil Skell replies to David Campbell
janice matchett
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 12:52:34 EDT)
Re: Phil Skell replies to David Campbell
Pim van Meurs
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 13:52:14 EDT)
Re: Phil Skell replies to David Campbell
janice matchett
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 13:12:46 EDT)
Re: Phil Skell replies to David Campbell
Pim van Meurs
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 14:14:25 EDT)
Re: Phil Skell replies to David Campbell
Pim van Meurs
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 13:32:00 EDT)
Re: Phil Skell replies to David Campbell
David C Campbell
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 16:32:03 EDT)
Re: Phil Skell replies to David Campbell
Joel Moore
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 18:36:10 EDT)
ID/TE conversations
Ted Davis
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 09:15:13 EDT)
Re: ID/TE conversations
randyisaac@adelphia.net
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 10:22:18 EDT)
Re: ID/TE conversations
Craig Rusbult
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 11:38:16 EDT)
The Universe in a Single Atom
Randy Isaac
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 21:00:52 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 22:53:31 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Jim Armstrong
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 02:54:56 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Don Winterstein
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 03:36:28 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Gregory Arago
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 06:48:17 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Michael Roberts
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 17:44:51 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Ted Davis
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 08:34:01 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Don Nield
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 16:56:41 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
George Murphy
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 17:41:50 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Don Nield
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 18:05:53 EDT)
RE: The Universe in a Single Atom
Alexanian, Moorad
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 08:46:45 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Mccarrick, Alan D CIV NSWCCD Philadelphia, 9212
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 09:09:51 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Robert Schneider
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 07:25:16 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Iain Strachan
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 09:10:27 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Bill Hamilton
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 11:56:08 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
cmekve@aol.com
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 17:33:24 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
George L. Murphygmurphy@raex.com
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 10:41:46 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
David C Campbell
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 12:12:16 EDT)
RE: The Universe in a Single Atom
janice matchett
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 12:15:36 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 00:58:45 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
Jim Armstrong
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 03:19:34 EDT)
Re: The Universe in a Single Atom
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 18:50:09 EDT)
Message from Phil Skell
Ted Davis
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 13:24:40 EDT)
Re: Message from Phil Skell
Pim van Meurs
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 13:58:35 EDT)
RE: Message from Phil Skell
Alexanian, Moorad
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 14:43:04 EDT)
Re: Message from Phil Skell
Terry M. Gray
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 15:50:07 EDT)
Re: Message from Phil Skell
Pim van Meurs
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 00:15:31 EDT)
Re: Message from Phil Skell
David C Campbell
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 19:12:04 EDT)
Re: Message from Phil Skell
Pim van Meurs
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 00:23:54 EDT)
Re: Message from Phil Skell
Pim van Meurs
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 00:27:01 EDT)
Re: Mitigating Risk
douglas.hayworth@perbio.com
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 10:05:04 EDT)
Re: Mitigating Risk
Randy Isaac
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 20:48:50 EDT)
engineering questions re. Katrina
Keith Miller
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 22:29:12 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Terry M. Gray
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 01:12:34 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Robert Schneider
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 07:17:33 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Ted Davis
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 09:38:20 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Freeman, Louise Margaret
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 10:34:02 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
janice matchett
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 12:52:55 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Glenn Morton
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 09:55:50 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Rich Blinne
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 11:30:45 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Bill Yoder
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 22:04:24 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
George Murphy
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 08:32:48 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Rich Blinne
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 12:10:46 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Bill Hamilton
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 12:28:51 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Keith Miller
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 23:07:28 EDT)
RE: engineering questions re. Katrina
Kevin Woods
(Mon Sep 26 2005 - 00:11:42 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
glennmorton@entouch.net
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 23:36:12 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Keith Miller
(Sat Sep 24 2005 - 10:50:10 EDT)
Re: engineering questions re. Katrina
Glenn Morton
(Sun Sep 25 2005 - 07:39:37 EDT)
Death of Founding Father
Jack Haas
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 17:22:47 EDT)
Re: [BULK] - Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
douglas.hayworth@perbio.com
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 17:15:47 EDT)
Re: [BULK] - Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
David C Campbell
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 19:53:26 EDT)
Re: [BULK] - Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Jim Armstrong
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 20:32:59 EDT)
Re: [BULK] - Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
douglas.hayworth@perbio.com
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 08:58:02 EDT)
ID People
Jim Armstrong
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 15:27:39 EDT)
Re: ID People
Terry M. Gray
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 15:48:55 EDT)
Re: ID People
steven@bowness.demon.co.uk
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 16:27:56 EDT)
What were Galileo's scientific and biblical conflicts with the Church?
janice matchett
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 12:59:15 EDT)
Fwd: REVIEW: Judaken on Weikart, _From Darwin to Hitler_
Ted Davis
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 09:31:08 EDT)
India Joins Search for Oil off Cuba's Coast/Kuwait offers to build first refinery in U.S. in 30 years
janice matchett
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 09:13:44 EDT)
Re: India Joins Search for Oil off Cuba's Coast/Kuwait offers to build first refinery in U.S. in 30 years
Glenn Morton
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 09:44:24 EDT)
Re: India Joins Search for Oil off Cuba's Coast/Kuwait offers to build first refinery in U.S. in 30 years
janice matchett
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 10:21:18 EDT)
Re: India Joins Search for Oil off Cuba's Coast/Kuwait offers to build first refinery in U.S. in 30 years
Michael Roberts
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 12:26:25 EDT)
Re: India Joins Search for Oil off Cuba's Coast/Kuwait offers to build first refinery in U.S. in 30 years
janice matchett
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 12:38:28 EDT)
Re: India Joins Search for Oil off Cuba's Coast/Kuwait offers to build first refinery in U.S. in 30 years
George Murphy
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 12:40:29 EDT)
Beyond the 'Evolution vs. Creation' Debate
Jim Armstrong
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 18:47:48 EDT)
Post-Darwinist: Discussion of evil in a science journal
steven@bowness.demon.co.uk
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 03:55:36 EDT)
Re: Re no death prior to the fall....
Joanna Woo
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 17:39:41 EDT)
Re: [Norton AntiSpam] Re: Re no death prior to the fall....
Jim Armstrong
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 19:03:30 EDT)
Re: Re no death prior to the fall....
George Murphy
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 09:35:16 EDT)
Re: Re no death prior to the fall....
Joanna Woo
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 12:23:48 EDT)
Re: Re no death prior to the fall....
Joanna Woo
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 12:24:54 EDT)
Re: Re no death prior to the fall....
George Murphy
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 14:06:08 EDT)
Re: Re no death prior to the fall....
Jim Armstrong
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 15:04:30 EDT)
Re: Re no death prior to the fall....
Roger G. Olson
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 17:29:43 EDT)
RE: Re no death prior to the fall....
Hofmann, Jim
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 20:14:19 EDT)
Re: Re no death prior to the fall....
George Murphy
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 22:11:26 EDT)
RE: Re no death prior to the fall....
Ted Davis
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 09:03:57 EDT)
Falk's Coming to Peace with Science
Freeman, Louise Margaret
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 15:06:12 EDT)
Re: Falk's Coming to Peace with Science
Ted Davis
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 17:08:58 EDT)
Re: Falk's Coming to Peace with Science
SteamDoc@aol.com
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 22:36:53 EDT)
Re: Falk's Coming to Peace with Science
Freeman, Louise Margaret
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 10:23:08 EDT)
Re: Falk's Coming to Peace with Science
Chris Barden
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 11:13:55 EDT)
Re: Falk's Coming to Peace with Science
Gregory Arago
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 16:10:16 EDT)
Re: Re no death prior to the fall....
Glenn Morton
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 17:44:02 EDT)
Re: Re no death prior to the fall....
gordon brown
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 20:14:42 EDT)
Tony Blair Pulls the Plug on Kyoto at Clinton Summit
janice matchett
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 12:44:33 EDT)
Post-Darwinist: Discussion of evil in a science journal
Denyse O'Leary
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 11:19:15 EDT)
Re: Post-Darwinist: Discussion of evil in a science journal
George Murphy
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 11:40:21 EDT)
Re: [BULK] - Re: The Fall
douglas.hayworth@perbio.com
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 13:35:26 EDT)
Science and Religion as Antagonistic as Ever
Terry M. Gray
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 16:55:45 EDT)
RE: Science and Religion as Antagonistic as Ever
pbrunt
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 04:49:19 EDT)
Re: asa-digest V1 #4954
Carol or John Burgeson
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 13:07:48 EDT)
Arv Edgeworth
Bill Hamilton
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 11:56:34 EDT)
Re: Arv Edgeworth
pcjones5@comcast.net
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 16:47:36 EDT)
Re: Arv Edgeworth
gordon brown
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 17:38:27 EDT)
Re: Arv Edgeworth
David C Campbell
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 12:37:02 EDT)
NYTimes.com: March of the Conservatives: Penguin Film as Political Fodder
koopa@gvsu.edu
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 10:18:08 EDT)
Re: [ACG] Re: Arv Edgeworth
Michael Roberts
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 09:12:54 EDT)
Re: [ACG] Re: Arv Edgeworth
Michael Roberts
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 15:25:27 EDT)
Re: [BULK] - RE: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
douglas.hayworth@perbio.com
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 08:27:19 EDT)
Re: [BULK] - Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
douglas.hayworth@perbio.com
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 16:47:14 EDT)
Arv Edgeworth
Charles Carrigan
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 15:37:36 EDT)
Re: Arv Edgeworth
Robert Schneider
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 19:21:32 EDT)
RE: Arv Edgeworth
Dick Fischer
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 11:30:25 EDT)
Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Ted Davis
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 13:24:20 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Pim van Meurs
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 13:51:55 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Joel Moore
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 16:28:31 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Pim van Meurs
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 12:17:47 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Joel Moore
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 16:39:15 EDT)
RE: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Alexanian, Moorad
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 17:14:28 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
George Murphy
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 20:02:34 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 22:55:52 EDT)
RE: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Alexanian, Moorad
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 07:18:39 EDT)
RE: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Dick Fischer
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 11:20:53 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
David C Campbell
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 12:29:56 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Terry M. Gray
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 13:24:07 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 14:45:13 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Terry M. Gray
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 15:11:30 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Peter Cook
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 19:18:04 EDT)
The Fall
Don Nield
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 20:08:57 EDT)
Re: The Fall
Ted Davis
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 09:10:52 EDT)
Re: The Fall
George Murphy
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 12:51:43 EDT)
Re: The Fall
David C Campbell
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 12:52:47 EDT)
Re: The Fall
Don Nield
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 16:36:54 EDT)
Re: The Fall
Michael Roberts
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 04:32:03 EDT)
Re: The Fall
RFaussette@aol.com
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 13:13:51 EDT)
Re: The Fall
RFaussette@aol.com
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 13:15:50 EDT)
Re: The Fall
David Bradford
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 15:54:14 EDT)
Re: The Fall
George Murphy
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 16:28:57 EDT)
Re: The Fall
RFaussette@aol.com
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 17:27:44 EDT)
Re: The Fall
RFaussette@aol.com
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 17:38:35 EDT)
Re: The Fall
George Murphy
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 17:44:41 EDT)
Re: The Fall
RFaussette@aol.com
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 17:48:13 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 19:47:22 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Robert Schneider
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 20:19:58 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 21:37:46 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Robert Schneider
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 08:24:28 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 11:09:36 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Terry M. Gray
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 12:33:59 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Don Nield
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 19:41:16 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
David C Campbell
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 18:15:43 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 14:35:16 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Michael Roberts
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 15:25:05 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 00:17:36 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 16:46:10 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 14:06:09 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Terry M. Gray
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 15:52:55 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Michael Roberts
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 17:17:45 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 19:12:38 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
George Murphy
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 22:18:16 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 22:47:29 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Terry M. Gray
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 03:03:22 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Michael Roberts
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 15:38:40 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Michael Roberts
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 03:02:20 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
George Murphy
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 09:33:34 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Robert Schneider
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 12:03:33 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 14:01:18 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 15:54:52 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 17:09:15 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 11:27:26 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
George Murphy
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 13:30:56 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 17:15:40 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Terry M. Gray
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 19:24:06 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 22:22:22 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Terry M. Gray
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 23:05:14 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 11:12:08 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Pim van Meurs
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 12:53:51 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
George Murphy
(Sun Sep 18 2005 - 20:13:24 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
George Murphy
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 22:40:58 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
RFaussette@aol.com
(Sat Sep 17 2005 - 13:38:22 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
David C Campbell
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 15:01:56 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 16:30:56 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Terry M. Gray
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 16:55:44 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 20:48:37 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Pim van Meurs
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 22:10:58 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Terry M. Gray
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 02:38:50 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 10:23:57 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Pim van Meurs
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 13:07:35 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 07:57:24 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Pim van Meurs
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 13:10:16 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Terry M. Gray
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 15:51:02 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 17:43:44 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Pim van Meurs
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 19:04:01 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 23:26:47 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Pim van Meurs
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 13:44:57 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Terry M. Gray
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 12:10:20 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 08:33:20 EDT)
RE: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Dick Fischer
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 09:16:25 EDT)
RE: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Bill Hamilton
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 09:18:17 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Pim van Meurs
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 13:25:47 EDT)
RE: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Dick Fischer
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 21:02:55 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Bill Hamilton
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 12:37:35 EDT)
RE: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Alexanian, Moorad
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 08:52:55 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
David C Campbell
(Tue Sep 20 2005 - 18:38:43 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
douglas.hayworth@perbio.com
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 09:50:47 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 15:51:46 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Jim Armstrong
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 17:24:26 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Pim van Meurs
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 12:14:01 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
David C Campbell
(Wed Sep 21 2005 - 18:06:55 EDT)
RE: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Hofmann, Jim
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 11:19:32 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Cornelius Hunter
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 14:49:08 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Michael Roberts
(Thu Sep 22 2005 - 17:02:35 EDT)
Re: Is evolution really the central theory for all of biology?
Pim van Meurs
(Fri Sep 23 2005 - 11:17:28 EDT)
FW: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
Donald Perrett (E-mail)
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 23:37:23 EDT)
Re: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
Keith Miller
(Wed Sep 14 2005 - 20:29:49 EDT)
Re: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
Mccarrick, Alan D CIV NSWCCD Philadelphia, 9212
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 08:03:29 EDT)
Re: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
Terry M. Gray
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 11:48:53 EDT)
Re: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
Sarah Berel-Harrop
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 12:36:00 EDT)
Re: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
janice matchett
(Thu Sep 15 2005 - 12:36:20 EDT)
Re: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
Mccarrick, Alan D CIV NSWCCD Philadelphia, 9212
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 07:49:22 EDT)
Re: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
Terry M. Gray
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 12:58:14 EDT)
Re: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
janice matchett
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 09:23:11 EDT)
Re: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
Iain Strachan
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 09:44:32 EDT)
RE: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
Stephen J. Krogh, P.G.
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 09:58:46 EDT)
RE: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
Alexanian, Moorad
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 10:32:07 EDT)
Re: Teaching Evolution - Childs Perspective
janice matchett
(Fri Sep 16 2005 - 11:23:55 EDT)
Bishop Ussher
Hofmann, Jim
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 18:06:56 EDT)
Re: Bishop Ussher
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 18:43:02 EDT)
Re: Bishop Ussher
Ted Davis
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 18:47:18 EDT)
RE: Bishop Ussher
Hofmann, Jim
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 18:55:33 EDT)
Re: Bishop Ussher
Michael Roberts
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 02:24:32 EDT)
Re: Bishop Ussher
Michael Roberts
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 02:29:39 EDT)
Perceptions of science
Carol or John Burgeson
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 14:06:51 EDT)
tree of knowledge of good and evil and theology
John Hewlett
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 13:19:59 EDT)
Re: tree of knowledge of good and evil and theology
RFaussette@aol.com
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 19:08:11 EDT)
Is ID "devilish"
Ted Davis
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 15:50:25 EDT)
BS: Oil Companies Limited Refining Capacity to Drive Up Gas Prices
janice matchett
(Thu Sep 08 2005 - 11:59:49 EDT)
Writings about...
John Hewlett
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 18:53:49 EDT)
Important correction
Ted Davis
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 12:28:47 EDT)
ASA member publicly attaced in Iowa, for his religious views
Ted Davis
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 08:58:16 EDT)
Chain of Responsibility (BS Repellent)
janice matchett
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 10:14:12 EDT)
Re: Chain of Responsibility (BS Repellent)
Robert Schneider
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 14:28:15 EDT)
Re: Chain of Responsibility (BS Repellent)
Michael Roberts
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 17:22:35 EDT)
Re: Chain of Responsibility (BS Repellent)
Terry M. Gray
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 18:10:10 EDT)
Re: Chain of Responsibility (BS Repellent)
Lawrence Johnston
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 16:38:55 EDT)
Re: Chain of Responsibility (BS Repellent)
janice matchett
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 19:05:30 EDT)
Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
janice matchett
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 01:17:07 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Pim van Meurs
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 16:33:42 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
janice matchett
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 19:45:39 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Don Nield
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 20:25:00 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
janice matchett
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 20:32:39 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Don Nield
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 21:13:21 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
janice matchett
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 21:19:13 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Pim van Meurs
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 22:40:02 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Michael Roberts
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 01:55:31 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Robert Schneider
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 07:13:04 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Michael Roberts
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 17:47:18 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Michael Roberts
(Thu Sep 08 2005 - 17:08:06 EDT)
Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Don Nield
(Thu Sep 08 2005 - 17:51:15 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Robert Schneider
(Thu Sep 08 2005 - 22:51:19 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
George Murphy
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 08:16:43 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Chris Barden
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 10:52:15 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Michael Roberts
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 13:18:07 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Bill Hamilton
(Sat Sep 10 2005 - 15:48:00 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Michael Roberts
(Sat Sep 10 2005 - 16:54:20 EDT)
RE: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Alexanian, Moorad
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 13:49:13 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
George Murphy
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 14:41:36 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Robert Schneider
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 14:54:25 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Chris Barden
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 15:38:08 EDT)
RE: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Alexanian, Moorad
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 15:23:41 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Robert Schneider
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 17:07:02 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Terry M. Gray
(Sun Sep 11 2005 - 17:48:46 EDT)
RE: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Alexanian, Moorad
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 11:11:28 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
George Murphy
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 12:10:54 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Terry M. Gray
(Tue Sep 13 2005 - 01:58:02 EDT)
RE: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Alexanian, Moorad
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 12:46:03 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
George Murphy
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 16:52:55 EDT)
RE: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Alexanian, Moorad
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 18:01:06 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
George Murphy
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 19:14:59 EDT)
RE: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Alexanian, Moorad
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 19:46:15 EDT)
Re: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
George Murphy
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 20:31:51 EDT)
RE: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Alexanian, Moorad
(Mon Sep 12 2005 - 21:24:02 EDT)
Re: RE: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
David C Campbell
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 16:20:28 EDT)
RE: RE: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Alexanian, Moorad
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 16:44:29 EDT)
Re: RE: Public perceptions of science: was Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Fri Sep 09 2005 - 17:40:44 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
janice matchett
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 10:32:09 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
Pim van Meurs
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 11:32:44 EDT)
Re: Why Most Published Research Findings Are False
David C Campbell
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 18:26:16 EDT)
Shell's Ingenious Approach To Oil Shale Is Pretty Slick
janice matchett
(Sat Sep 03 2005 - 20:45:40 EDT)
Re: Shell's Ingenious Approach To Oil Shale Is Pretty Slick
Jim Armstrong
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 00:57:17 EDT)
Re: Shell's Ingenious Approach To Oil Shale Is Pretty Slick
janice matchett
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 01:16:21 EDT)
Re: Shell's Ingenious Approach To Oil Shale Is Pretty Slick
Al Koop
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 13:00:24 EDT)
Re: Shell's Ingenious Approach To Oil Shale Is Pretty Slick
Don Winterstein
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 07:30:14 EDT)
RE: Shell's Ingenious Approach To Oil Shale Is Pretty Slick
Glenn Morton
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 09:04:39 EDT)
Re: Shell's Ingenious Approach To Oil Shale Is Pretty Slick
Don Winterstein
(Wed Sep 07 2005 - 04:13:50 EDT)
Re: Shell's Ingenious Approach To Oil Shale Is Pretty Slick
Al Koop
(Wed Sep 07 2005 - 22:11:10 EDT)
Katrina
Randy Isaac
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 21:01:56 EDT)
Fwd: Emergency housing drive at www.hurricanehousing.org. Pass it on.
Keith Miller
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 23:57:17 EDT)
Re: Emergency housing drive at www.hurricanehousing.org. Pass it on.
Robert Schneider
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 06:53:03 EDT)
Re: Emergency housing drive.....Pass it on
janice matchett
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 20:29:30 EDT)
Re: Emergency housing drive.....Pass it on
anamchara7@juno.com
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 20:47:01 EDT)
Re: Emergency housing drive at www.hurricanehousing.org. Pass it on.
Sarah Berel-Harrop
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 10:47:29 EDT)
Re: Emergency housing drive at www.hurricanehousing.org. Pass it on.
Randy Isaac
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 19:19:52 EDT)
Re: scientific savvy
Rich Blinne
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 11:02:40 EDT)
RE: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Glenn Morton
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 07:31:01 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Robert Schneider
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 10:19:44 EDT)
RE: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Dick Fischer
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 11:58:34 EDT)
Re: bara
Jim Armstrong
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 14:32:38 EDT)
Re: bara
George Murphy
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 15:45:21 EDT)
Re: bara
Jim Armstrong
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 16:04:46 EDT)
Genesis Concealed?
Vernon Jenkins
(Mon Sep 19 2005 - 16:59:43 EDT)
Odds and Ends (was Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?)
Vernon Jenkins
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 18:29:25 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
Don Winterstein
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 04:48:58 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 14:15:37 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
Don Winterstein
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 06:25:03 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
George Murphy
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 07:46:57 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
Bill Hamilton
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 10:12:28 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 14:11:31 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
Don Winterstein
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 07:10:12 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 14:51:07 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
George Murphy
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 15:21:47 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
Bill Hamilton
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 22:37:31 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 23:58:29 EDT)
God's history (Was God the interactor)
George Murphy
(Sat Sep 03 2005 - 20:12:35 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 00:28:21 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
George Murphy
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 16:13:26 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 18:44:01 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
George Murphy
(Sun Sep 04 2005 - 19:35:37 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
Bill Hamilton
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 11:37:06 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
Terry M. Gray
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 11:42:13 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
George Murphy
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 16:43:55 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 00:29:12 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 15:07:39 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 14:58:41 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
George Murphy
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 16:08:20 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 18:14:01 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
George Murphy
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 07:38:45 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
Bill Hamilton
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 12:31:22 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 14:43:49 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
Bill Hamilton
(Wed Sep 07 2005 - 06:59:14 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Wed Sep 07 2005 - 15:15:46 EDT)
Re: God's history (Was God the interactor)
Bill Hamilton
(Wed Sep 07 2005 - 17:07:17 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Sat Sep 03 2005 - 00:25:41 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
Bill Hamilton
(Sat Sep 03 2005 - 07:35:17 EDT)
Re: God the interactor (was God the tinkerer)
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Tue Sep 06 2005 - 14:16:49 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Iain Strachan
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 03:06:00 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Michael Roberts
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 06:39:52 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Gregory Arago
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 07:25:59 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Robert Schneider
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 08:12:51 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Iain Strachan
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 09:14:50 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Randy Isaac
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 08:42:20 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
gordon brown
(Mon Sep 05 2005 - 14:34:04 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Peter Ruest
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 11:19:09 EDT)
Interpreting Genesis Ch 1 (was: How to encourage a ..... )
Iain Strachan
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 16:45:35 EDT)
Re: Interpreting Genesis Ch 1
Peter Ruest
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 11:10:30 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Peter Ruest
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 11:19:03 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Bill Hamilton
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 12:00:29 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Michael Roberts
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 12:10:04 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Robert Schneider
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 20:20:26 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Peter Ruest
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 11:11:00 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Peter Ruest
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 11:10:52 EDT)
RE: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Glenn Morton
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 17:41:56 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Peter Ruest
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 11:11:05 EDT)
RE: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Glenn Morton
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 19:43:46 EDT)
RE: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Glenn Morton
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 19:45:23 EDT)
Re: Interpreting Genesis Ch 1
Peter Ruest
(Sat Sep 03 2005 - 12:33:01 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
D. F. Siemens, Jr.
(Thu Sep 01 2005 - 14:29:09 EDT)
RE: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Dick Fischer
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 14:12:36 EDT)
Re: How to encourage a former creationist to persevere in faith?
Peter Ruest
(Fri Sep 02 2005 - 00:48:05 EDT)
Last message date
:
Fri Sep 30 2005 - 14:14:58 EDT
Archived on
: Fri Sep 30 2005 - 14:14:58 EDT
488 messages
sort by
: [
author
] [
date
] [
subject
] [
attachment
]
Nearby
: [
Other mail archives
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.1.8
: Fri Sep 30 2005 - 14:14:58 EDT