Re: agreeing about a mere creation?

From: Craig Rusbult <craig@chem.wisc.edu>
Date: Thu Jul 28 2005 - 11:34:31 EDT

Ted says,

>Answers in Genesis, however, won't like it much.

    Yes, they do emphasize the necessity of young-earth views.

    But I wonder if there is a difference, in terms of cognitive dissonance
-- Ham, Sarfati, Morris & Morris,... are intelligent and scientifically
trained, and they have seen the data -- between what they think and feel in
private (in the middle of the night, do they ever wonder if they might be
wrong?) and in public?

    And logically, would they pay attention to the IF nature of a "mere
creation" belief? For example, do they think about meeting God
face-to-face someday, about what they would say?
    For example, in his page about "appearance of age" John Morris says:
"if fallen scientists extrapolating present process are right and the
universe is old, then God has lied to us." WOW.
http://www.icr.org/index.php?module=articles&action=view&ID=1088

Craig
Received on Thu Jul 28 11:34:53 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Thu Jul 28 2005 - 11:34:54 EDT