Roger G. Olson wrote:
>Point of information: what do you mean by "Darwinism" here? Do you mean
>ontological naturalism?
>
>Roger
>
>
I suppose so. I was arguing tu quoque and thus I was adopting the ID
viewpoint in this post. Since they don't make a distinction between
ontological and methodological naturalism, neither did I. My point is
DI's actions are inconsistent with their warfare model strategy. Somehow
I don't see Denyse leading the story with "Discovery Institute Sells
Out", though. If this is an indication that they are moving away from
the warfare model then I could support them more fully. I just don't
think that is the case but rather was a failed attempt at the wedge
strategy.
Received on Sun May 29 22:45:28 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun May 29 2005 - 22:45:31 EDT