"You still didn't answer the point. Why does a resurrection prove design in creation? "
>The resurrection of Christ was unique. A one time occurrence. It was miraculous. So, God intervenes in the real world, because
>the resurrection could not have occurred through natural processes. I have no idea how he accomplishes this intervention,
>nevertheless, this event was something beyond naturalistic explanation, it was supernatural. So, if God intervened in this instance,
>an event that the Bible describes in detail, and with eyewitness accounts, this would be an example of what you are asking
>for, something that "we" believe is an example where the Bible describes the supernatural intervening with the natural. And what is
>design, but a designer, God, intervening in his creation
No, it is an example of what I have said in my previous posts, but you haven't paid any attention to. You start with the assumption that Christianity (e.g. the resurrection) is true. Then you derive your apologetic. Such a procedure is circular and thus fideistic. If you would really try to understand that point, then you might understand what I have been saying in this thread. YECs and you start with the assumption that there is zero possibility that the resurrection is wrong. Then the YECs proceed to protect the Bible by saying that science is wrong, and you proceed to protect the Bible by saying that it doesn't say any thing true about tangible reality.
Like it or not, the resurrection can't be considered tangible reality because it is not repeatable.
Received on Thu May 26 09:36:09 2005