Antony Flew

I think Antony Flew is as ignorant of science as Michael Roberts thinks many humanists are ignorant of religion.

Flew wrote in Jan. 2005 'I now realize that I have made a fool of myself by believing that there were no presentable theories of the development of inanimate matter up to the first living creature capable of reproduction.'

He blames his error on being "misled" by Richard Dawkins.....

While Flew is to be praised for exhibiting the usual atheist habit of being open-minded to the evidence, he should also be censured for not researching the evidence properly.
Received on Wed May 25 01:11:00 2005