Re: Kansas

Bill Payne pointed out the following:

>Here's a less than friendly opinion from Chuck Colson:
>
>http://www.pfm.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=BreakPoint1&Template=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=15990
>
>It seems that this is all about public perception, and boycotting the hearings really doesn't play well.  But then again, I guess the evolutionists felt that they had no choice.  Too bad there can't be a friendly, rational, unemotional discussion.
>

Colson has a point. However, I disagree with your
comment that "they had no choice" and Colson's final
point that evolutionists would lose if they debated.

Many creationists have used politics for a
long time. (I do acknowledge that as far as I
can recall, you have at least kept to science,
so I make sure to say "many" but not "all".)

At any rate, for the science community to stoop
to the same level as many Creationists does a lot
more harm than good to the issues that are at stake.

However, I think rather than having "no choice", they
made a very poor choice and are now setting a poor example
of how to stand tall in the face of certain unreserved and
bombastic politicians.

by Grace alone we proceed,
Wayne
Received on Wed May 11 00:17:12 2005