> Would you accept my main point however, that God's interventions in nature
> are more to do with revealing Himself to us, rather than helping nature over
> the tricky bits? (I think Richard Dawkins used this phrase in an article in
> the UK Daily Telegraph). God creates a universe in which inevitably
> intelligent creatures are going to evolve - it seems fantastic that this
> could ever happen knowing the amazing complexity of life, but God's a much
> better designer than anyone else. And when these creatures evolve, they are
> going to ask deep questions Who am I? Where do I come from? Is it all a huge
> fluke? etc. And God intervenes, often "supernaturally" at this point,
> inspiring men to write down scripture under the inspiration of the Holy
> Spirit, by performing miracles of healing, showing his compassion, and
> ultimately by his sacrificial death on the Cross. It seems to me that all
> the points in scripture where God has intervened are so that we might know
> that he is God (e.g. the healing of the man born blind - John 9:3).
I'd agree with this (assuming that you are including all interventions, such as the Biblical miracles-I don't think you mean to imply that there must be interventions within the course of physical evolution). It also relates to a basic problem of ID/YEC science arguments. They don't reveal God to us. There's no way to tell whether the intelligent designer/recent creator is YHWH or Zeus or Allah or Ungabunga or hyperintelligent aliens or....
The biblical terminology of "signs" relates to this function of miracles-as pointers to God.
Dr. David Campbell
Old Seashells
University of Alabama
Biodiversity & Systematics
Dept. Biological Sciences
Box 870345
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0345 USA
bivalve@mail.davidson.alumlink.com
That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand Exalted Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks-P.G. Wodehouse, Romance at Droitgate Spa
Received on Mon May 2 17:34:28 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon May 02 2005 - 17:34:28 EDT