Re: CT article: Darwinists, not Christians, stonewalling the facts

How do all of you feel that ASA should respond to editorials such as
Colson's?

a) Ignore it?
b) Encourage members to write letters to the editor clarifying some of the
issues so that maybe one of them might be published?
c) Just discuss it/criticize it among ourselves but keep quiet publicly?
d) Use it as a basis for discussion in our respective churches?
e) Encourage the director to write a letter to the editor? (not an ASA
position but a personal opinion, identified as the ASA director)
f) None of the above? any combination of the above? other?

I do believe that Colson doesn't frame the issue very well and that CT
readers deserve a better perspective.
Thinking beyond Colson and this article, how pro-active should ASA be, as an
organization, to articulate the relevant perspectives and issues without
advocating any particular view?

Randy

----- Original Message -----
From: "jack syme" <drsyme@cablespeed.com>
To: <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 7:49 PM
Subject: Re: CT article: Darwinists, not Christians, stonewalling the facts

> The rhetoric and ignorance displayed by Colson here, strikes me exactly
> the same way his rhetorical BreakPoint commentary on the Schiavo case on
> Friday did.
>
> Either he doesnt care about the truth, or he is in serious need of a fact
> checker.
>
> In either case, this is irresponsible commentary. Another embarassement
> for Christianity IMO.
>
>
Received on Mon Mar 28 21:18:33 2005