So -------------?
What is wrong with the idea of exploring all truth -- instead of just
scientific naturalistic truth? Are the other courses in High School just
based upon provable tents? Of course they are not and why should we deny
it?!
I think that ASAers may have become blind to the nature of truth and
the nature of the public education system which is run by humanistic
educators.
But that is just IMHO
As scientists, are we ashamed of the gospel and just cow tow to views
by the ultraliberal political philosophers in schools and politics?
Walt
Carol or John Burgeson wrote:
> Nearly one-third of science teachers who participated in a national
> survey
> say they feel pressured to include creationism-related ideas in the
> classroom.
> http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2005-03-23-evolution_x.htm
>
> Burgy
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com> In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem) You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================Received on Mon Mar 28 19:04:04 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Mar 28 2005 - 19:04:06 EST