What's the reason for putting "husband" in quotes? Surely this is not a
rhetorical technique putatively to strengthen your opinion on this matter?
BTW, this is a question I haven't seen addressed in the media nor on the
listserve. Is there a pecuniary or other disadvantage for Terri's husband
(no quotations) for divorcing her and letting her parents become her legal
guardians? Is it possible -- just possible, just even a teensy-weensy bit
possible -- in view of all the media coverage on both sides of the issue
and all the adjudication, that Terri's husband (no quotations) is actually
interested in carrying out Terri's wishes?
God's Peace,
Roger
> If Terri's "husband" had agreed with the Schindlers to continue to feed
> her, then the courts would have nothing say!
>
> Moorad
>
>
Received on Sun Mar 27 23:46:29 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Mar 27 2005 - 23:46:31 EST