----- Original Message -----
From: "Glenn Morton" <glennmorton@entouch.net>
To: "'Don Winterstein'" <dfwinterstein@msn.com>; "'asa'" <asa@calvin.edu>;
"'John and Carol Burgeson'" <burgytwo@juno.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2005 11:48 AM
Subject: RE: The YEC's have won
> Having long advocated that the only way one can stay within the data of
> modern science and at the same time preserve any shred of historicity to
> Genesis, one must move Adam way way back in time. I prefer further than
> H. erectus, but few dare tread where I do.
A revealing statement. Does this mean that we don't need to preserve
historicity but only "a shred" of it? How much is "a shred"?
FWIW, I think a lot of us who don't think we should take the route of
historical concordism would still say that early Genesis contains at least
"a shred" of historical data. But maybe our shreds aren't big enough.
Happy Easter . Christos aneste!
Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
Received on Sat Mar 26 22:30:38 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Mar 26 2005 - 22:30:46 EST