Re: A reaction to ID

----- Original Message -----
From: "Ted Davis" <tdavis@messiah.edu>
To: <asa@calvin.edu>; <dickfischer@earthlink.net>; <gmurphy@raex.com>;
<michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
Cc: <Tony.Ortega@pitch.com>
Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2005 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: A reaction to ID

> George,
>
> It has to be a rare situation, when an historian gets to correct a
> theologian about the theological details of a particular view on
> science/religion, but in this case I actually get to do that! (I have no
> doubt that you will be able to find the occasional *historical* error in
> my
> comments, if the truth be told.)
>
> My comments are inserted below, the error is in point 2 of George's post.

Ted -
    Yes, mea culpa, I was sloppy in speaking about gap theory. My reply to
Michael & yours may have crossed in cyberspace. As I noted there, I've
never given much attention to gap theory but that doesn't excuse my
carelessness.

Shalom
George
http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
 
Received on Tue Mar 1 21:53:11 2005