Dick Fisher wrote:
"However, due to the misguided, protracted efforts of creationist organizations, the Bible is being tied to an errant interpretation. Abusing science in the process, they then foist the entire package on the 'willingly ignorant.'"
I assume you are talking about YEC here, is that the case?
This is a problem admittedly, but this is not a problem caused by ID as far as I can tell.
I am not sure how much harder this makes our job, because any scientfically minded skeptic would already have dismissed the "abused science" of creationism. As far as this effect on our fellow Christians who have been taught this misguided notion of science, well that is unfortunate, but how important is it really, as long as they understand and accept the Gospel?
"So what does TE contribute to the problem of
resolving Bible-science conflict?"
It at least gets us in the door. If we can show to a nonbeiliving scientist that there is design in the universe, that you cant have this universe as it is, you cant have humans as they are, without a designer, then you can at least get them to the point that Christianity is possible. After they are at least theists, then it is the Gospel that has to do the work from there.
"He doesn't need to "intervene" in His own creation. It is His creation from the get go. How closely or intimately He supervises the process by which the creation unfolds is the issue."
If by intervening you mean God acting outside of normal physical laws, then he has to intervene from time to time, in order for the Bible to be true. If you dont want to accept any other miracle that is in the Bible, you have to accept that there was a supernatural resurrection of Christ in order to be Christian. Without that, Christianity is meaningless.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Feb 16 2005 - 22:24:39 EST