Strait Gate Ministries

I received the following article in the mail. I would be interested in your opinions regarding the article's suggestion that Zionist influence has reinforced many of the beliefs of Christian fundamentalism. If it is true, it conforms to Kevin MacDonald's hypothesis in his trilogy on Judaism (that none of you have read?).
----------------
This article was written by Strait Gate Ministries co-founder two
years ago to answer the questions that the whole world wants to know
right now. “WHAT IS THE CHRISTIAN RIGHT and why do millions,
including our President, seem bent on enabling serial wars?” The real
answer (not the ones we hear on the News Hour) will sting, but it will
lead to peace, and will help restore Christian values. Please share
it. -Ed.

http://www.whtt.org/articles/020807.htm (read the origional text)

THE SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM IN THE MID EAST: Part II
WHY JUDEO-CHRISTIANS SUPPORT WAR
C. E. Carlson

The French author, Alexis de Tocqueville, wrote Democracy in America
when he traveled here in the first third of the 19th Century. In
ringing tones he sang the praises of America's invulnerable strength
and spirit. He attributed its greatness to its citizens' sense of
morality... even with the abundant church attendances he observed in
America. De Tocqueville wrote in French and is credited with this
familiar quote: “AMERICA IS GREAT BECAUSE SHE IS GOOD, and if America
ever ceases to be good, she will cease to be great.”

De Tocqueville could see the power of America, but he could not have
known in 1830 that she was soon to be under an attack aimed at its
churches and the very sense of morality that he extolled.

First, there was a War Between the States, which scarred the powerful
young nation in its strapping youth. A worse attack on America was to
commence near the turn of the 20th century. This was the onset of an
attack on American Christianity that continues unabated against the
traditional, Christ-following church. This attack, which author
Gordon Ginn calls “The final Apostasy,” began with a small very
wealthy and determined European political movement. It had a dream,
and the American churches stood in its way.

The World Zionist movement, as its Jewish founders called themselves,
had plans to acquire a homeland for all Jews worldwide, even though
most were far from homeless, and many did not want another home. Not
any land would do. World Zionists wanted a specific property that
American Christians called "the Holy Land." But if these Zionists
read "Democracy in America" or any of the journals of any of America's
churches, which no doubt they did, they could not help but know that
Jerusalem was not theirs to have. As selfproclaimed Jews, they were,
according to the Christian New Testament, the persecutors of Christ
and most of his early followers, and the engineers of his crucifixion.
America's traditional churches in the 19th Century would never stand
for a Jewish occupation of Jesus' homeland.

World Zionist leaders initiated a program to change America and its
religious orientation. One of the tools used to accomplish this goal
was an obscure and malleable Civil War veteran named Cyrus I.
Schofield. A much larger tool was a venerable, world respected
European book publisherThe Oxford University Press.

The scheme was to alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and
promoting a proZionist subculture within Christianity. Scofield's
role was to rewrite the King James Version of the Bible by inserting
Zionistfriendly notes in the margins, between verses and chapters,
and on the bottoms of the pages. The Oxford University Press used
Scofield, a pastor by then, as the Editor, probably because it needed
such as man for a front. The revised bible was called the Scofield
Reference Bible, and with limitless advertising and promotion, it
became a best selling "bible" in America and has remained so for 90
years.

The Scofield Reference Bible was not to be just another translation,
subverting minor passages a little at a time. No, Scofield produced a
revolutionary book that radically changed the context of the King
James Version. It was designed to create a subculture around a new
worship icon, the modern State of Israel, a state that did not yet
exist, but which was already on the drawing boards of the committed,
wellfunded authors of World Zionism.

Scofield's support came from a movement that took root around the turn
of the century, supposedly motivated by disillusionment over what it
considered the stagnation of the mainline American churches. Some of
these “reformers” were later to serve on Scofield’s Editorial Committee.

Scofield imitated a chain of past heretics and rapturists, most of
whose credibility fizzled over their faulty end times prophesies. His
mentor was one John Nelson Darby from Scotland, who was associated
with the Plymouth Brethren and who made no less than six evangelical
trips to the US selling what is today called “Darbyism.” It is from
Darby that Scofield is thought to have learned his Christian Zionist
theology, which he later planted in the footnotes of the Scofield
Reference Bible. It is possible that Scofield’s interest in Darbyism
was shared by Oxford University Press, for Darby was known to Oxford
University. (THE HISTORY OF DARBYISM -
http://www.cloudnet.com/~dwyman/neatby_toc.htm)

The Oxford University Press owned "The Scofield Reference Bible" from
the beginning, as indicated by its copyright, and Scofield stated he
received handsome royalties from Oxford. Oxford's advertisers and
promoters succeeded in making Scofield’s bible, with its Christian
Zionist footnotes, a standard for interpreting scripture in
Judeo-Christian churches, seminaries, and Bible study groups. It has
been published in at least four editions since its introduction in
1908 and remains one of the largest selling Bibles ever.

The Scofield Reference Bible and its several clones is all but
worshiped in the ranks of celebrity Christians, beginning with the
first media icon, evangelist Billy Graham. Of particular importance
to the Zionist penetration of American Christian churches has been the
fast growth of national bible study organizations, such as Bible Study
Fellowship and Precept Ministries. These draw millions of students
from not only evangelical fundamentalist churches, but also from
Catholic and mainline Protestant churches and non-church contacts.
These invariably teach forms of "dispensationalism," which draw their
theory, to various degrees, from the notes in the Oxford Bible.

Among more traditional churches that encourage, and in some cases
recommend, the use of the Scofield Reference Bible is the huge
Southern Baptist Convention of America, whose capture is World
Zionism's crowning achievement. Our report on Southern Baptist
Zionism, entitled “THE CAUSE OF THE CONFLICT: Fixing Blame,” can be
seen at (http://www.whtt.org/articles/020707.htm.)

Scofield, whose work is largely believed to be the product of Darby
and others, wisely chose not to change the text of the King James
Edition. Instead, he added hundreds of easytoread footnotes at the
bottom of about half of the pages, and as the Old English grammar of
the KJE becomes increasingly difficult for progressive generations of
readers, students become increasingly dependent on the modern language
footnotes.

Scofield's notes weave parts of the Old and New Testaments together as
though all were written at the same time by the same people. This is
a favorite device of modern dispensationalists who essentially weigh
all scripture against the unspoken and preposterous theory that the
older it is, the more authoritative. In many cases the Oxford
references prove to be puzzling rabbit trails leading nowhere, simply
diversions. Scofield's borrowed ideas were later popularized under
the labels and definitions that have evolved into common usage
today"premillennialism," "dispensationalism," "JudeoChristianity,"
and most recently the highly political movement openly called
"Christian Zionism."

Thanks to the work of a few dedicated researchers, much of the
questionable personal history of Cyrus I. Scofield is available. It
reveals he was not a Bible scholar as one might expect, but a
political animal with the charm and talent for selfpromotion of a
Bill Clinton. Scofield's background reveals a criminal history, a
deserted wife, a wrecked family, and a penchant for selfserving lies.
He was exactly the sort of man the World Zionists might hire to bend
Christian thoughta controllable man and one capable of carrying the
secret to his grave. (See The Incredible Scofield and His Book by
Joseph M. Canfield).

Other researchers have examined Scofield's eschatology and exposed his
original work as apostate and heretic to traditional Christian views.
Among these is a massive work by Stephen Sizer entitled Christian
Zionism, Its History, Theology and Politics.
(http://virginiawater.org.uk/christchurch)

We Hold These Truths is grateful to these dedicated researchers. Our
own examination of the Oxford Bible has gone in another direction,
focusing not on what Scofield wrote, but on some of the many additions
and deletions The Oxford University Press has continued to make to
Scofield Reference Bible since his death in 1921. These alterations
have further radicalized the Scofield Bible into a manual for the
Christian worship of the State of Israel beyond what Schofield would
have dreamed of. This unChristian antiArab theology has permitted
the theft of Palestine and 54 years of death and destruction against
the Palestinians, with hardly a complaint from the Judeo-Christian
mass media evangelists or most other American church leaders. We
thank God for the exceptions.

It is no exaggeration to say that the 1967 Oxford 4th Edition
deifies--makes a God of--the State of Israel, a state that did not
even exist when Scofield wrote the original footnotes in 1908. This
writer believes that, had it not been for misguided antiArab race
hatred promoted by Christian Zionist leaders in America, neither the
Gulf War nor the Israeli war against the Palestinians would have
occurred, and a million or more people who have perished would be
alive today.

What proof does WHTT have to incriminate World Zionism in a scheme to
control Christianity? For proof we offer the words themselves that
were planted in the 1967 Edition, 20 years after the State of Israel
was created in 1947, and 46 years after Scofield's death. The words
tell us that those who control the Oxford Press recreated a bible to
misguide Christians and sell flaming Zionism in the churches of America.

There is little reason to believe that Scofield knew or cared much
about the Zionist movement, but at some point, he became involved in a
close and secret relationship with Samuel Untermeyer, a New York
lawyer whose firm still exists today and one of the wealthiest and
most powerful World Zionists in America. Untermeyer controlled the
unbreakable thread that connected him with Scofield. They shared a
password and a common watering holeand it appears that Untermeyer
may have been the one who provided the money that Scofield himself
lacked. Scofield's success as an international bible editor without
portfolio and his lavish living in Europe could only have been
accomplished with financial aid and international influence.

This connection might have remained hidden, were it not for the work
of Joseph M. Canfield, the author and researcher who discovered clues
to the thread in Scofield family papers. But even had the threads
connecting Scofield to Untermeyer and Zionism never been exposed, it
would still be obvious that that connection was there. It is
significant that Oxford, not Scofield, owned the book, and that after
Scofield's death, Oxford accelerated changes to it. Since the death
of its original author and namesake, The Scofield Reference Bible has
gone through several editions. Massive proZionist notes were added
to the 1967 edition, and some of Scofield's most significant notes
from the original editions were removed where they apparently failed
to further Zionist aims fast enough. Yet this edition retains the
title, "The New Scofield Reference Bible, Holy Bible, Editor C.I.
Scofield." It's antiArab, Christian subculture theology has made an
enormous contribution to war, turning Christians into participants in
genocide against Arabs in the latter half of the 20th century.

The most convincing evidence of the unseen Zionist hand that wrote the
Scofield notes to the venerable King James Bible is the content of the
notes themselves, for only Zionists could have written them. These
notes are the subject of this paper.

Oxford edited the former 1945 Edition of SRB in 1967, at the time of
the Six Day War when Israel occupied Palestine. The new footnotes to
the King James Bible presumptuously granted the rights to the
Palestinians' land to the State of Israel and specifically denied the
Arab Palestinians any such rights at all. One of the most brazen and
outrageous of these NEWLY INSERTED footnotes states:

"FOR A NATION TO COMMIT THE SIN OF ANTISEMITISM BRINGS INEVITABLE
JUDGMENT." (page 1920, footnote (3) to Genesis 12:3.) (our emphasis added)

This statement sounds like something from Ariel Sharon, or the Chief
Rabbi in Tel Aviv, or Theodore Herzl, the founder of Modern Zionism.
But these exact words are found between the covers of the 1967 Edition
of the Oxford Bible that is followed by millions of American
churchgoers and students and is used by their leaders as a source for
their preaching and teaching.

There is no word for "anti-Semitism" in the New Testament, nor is it
found among the Ten Commandments. "Sin," this writer was taught, is a
personal concept. It is something done by individuals in conflict
with God's words, not by "nations." Even Sodom did not sin,its people
did. The word "judgment" in the Bible always refers to God's action.
In the Christian New Testament, Jesus promises both judgment and
salvation for believing individuals, not for "nations."

There was also no "State of Israel" when Scofield wrote his original
notes in his concocted Scofield Reference Bible in 1908. All
references to Israel as a state were added AFTER 1947, when Israel was
granted statehood by edict of the United Nations. The Oxford
University Press simply rewrote its version of the Christian Bible in
1967 to make antipathy toward the "State of Israel" a "sin." Israel
is made a god to be worshiped, not merely a "state." David BenGurion
could not have written it better. Perhaps he did write it!

The Oxford 1967 Edition continues on page 19:

"(2) GOD MADE AN UNCONDITIONAL PROMISE OF BLESSINGS THROUGH ABRAM'S
SEED (a) TO THE NATION OF ISRAEL TO INHERIT A SPECIFIC TERRITORY FOREVER"

"(3) THERE IS A PROMISE OF BLESSING UPON THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND NATIONS
WHO BLESS ABRAM'S DESCENDANTS, AND A CURSE LAID UPON THOSE WHO
PERSECUTE THE JEWS." (Page 19, 1967 Edition Genesis 12:13)

This bequeath is joined to an Oxford prophesy that never occurs in the
Bible itself:

"IT HAS INVARIABLY FARED ILL WITH THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PERSECUTED THE
JEW, WELL WITH THOSE WHO HAVE PROTECTED HIM." and "THE FUTURE WILL
STILL MORE REMARKABLY PROVE THIS PRINCIPLE"(footnote (3) bottom of
page1920Genesis 12:3)

None of these notes appeared in the original Scofield Reference Bible
or in the 1917 or 1945 editions. The state of Israel DID NOT EXIST in
1945, and according to the best dictionaries of the time, the word
"Israel" only referred to a particular man and an ancient tribe, which
is consistent with the Bible text. See "Israel," Webster's New
International Dictionary 2nd (1950) Edition.

All of this language, including the prophecy about the future being
really bad for those who "persecute the Jews," reflects and furthers
the goals of the Anti-Defamation League, which has a stated goal of
creating an environment where opposing the State of Israel is
considered "anti-Semitism," and "antiSemitism" is a "hate crime"
punishable by law. This dream has become a reality in the Christian
Zionist churches of America. Only someone with these goals could have
written this footnote.

The State of Israel's legal claims to Arab lands are based on the
United Nations Partitioning Agreement of 1947, which gave the Jews
only a fraction of the land they have since occupied by force. But
when this author went to Israel and asked various Israelis where they
got the right to occupy Palestine, each invariably said words to the
effect that "God gave it to us." This interpretation of Hebrew
scripture stems from the book of Genesis and is called the "Abrahamic
Covenant". It is repeated several times and begins with God's promise
to a man called Abraham who was eventually to become the grandfather
of a man called "Israel:"

"[2] AND I WILL MAKE OF THEE A GREAT NATION, AND I WILL BLESS THEE,
AND MAKE THY NAME GREAT; AND THOU SHALL BE A BLESSING:"

"[3] AND I WILL BLESS THEM THAT BLESS THEE, AND CURSE HIM THAT CURSETH
THEE: AND IN THEE SHALL ALL FAMILIES OF THE EARTH BE BLESSED." Genesis
12:3, King James Edition.

It is upon this promise to a single person that modern Israeli
Zionists base their claims to what amounts to the entire MidEast.
Its logic is roughly the equivalent of someone claiming to be the heir
to the John Paul Getty estate because the great man had once sent a
letter to someone's cousin seven times removed containing the
salutation "wishing you my very best." In "Sherry's War," We Hold
These Truths provides a common sense discussion of the Abrahamic
Covenant and how millions of Christians are taught to misunderstand it.

It is tempting to engage in academic arguments to show readers the
lack of logic in Scofield's theology, which has led followers of
Christ so far astray. It seems all too easy to refute the various
Bible references given in support of Scofield's strange writings. But
we will resist the temptation to do this, because others have already
done it quite well, and more importantly because it leads us off our
course.

It is also inviting to dig into Scofield's sordid past as Canfield has
done, revealing him to be a convicted felon and probable pathological
liar, but we leave that to others, because our interest is not in
Scofield's life, but in saving the lives of millions of innocent
people who are threatened by the continuing Zionist push for perpetual
war.

Instead, we will examine the words on their face. The words in these
1967 footnotes are Zionist propaganda that has been tacked onto the
text of a Christian Bible. Most of them make no sense, except to
support the Zionist State of Israel in its war against the
Palestinians and any other wars it may enter into. In this purpose,
Zionism has completely succeeded. American JudeoChristians, more
recently labeled “Christian Zionists,” have remained mute during wars
upon Israel's enemies in Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Bosnia and
elsewhere. It is past time to stop the spilling of more blood, some
of it Christian blood.

Now, for evidence of the intent of the Zionists deception of
Christians, let us examine some Scofield's notes THAT HAVE BEEN
ALTERED OR REMOVED by Oxford after his death. In 1908 Scofield wrote
in 1908:

( Scofield's 1945 page 1127, note to John 8:39)

Compare that with the Oxford note substituted in the 1967 Edition:

"8:37 ALL JEWS ARE NATURAL DESCENDANTS OF ABRAHAM, BUT ARE NOT
NECESSARILY HIS SPIRITUAL POSTERITY, CP Rom 968, Gal 3: 614" (Note
(1) P1136, Oxford 1967 Edition, note to Jn 8:37.)

How, pray tell, can "all Jews" be "natural descendants of Abraham," a
Chaldean who lived some 3000 years ago? Persons of all races are Jews
and new Jews are being converted every day from every race. One might
as well say all Lutherans are the natural descendants of Martin
Luther; or that all Baptists come from the loins of John the Baptist.
This note could only have been written by an Israeli patriot, for no
one else would have a vested interest in promoting this genetic
nonsense. Shame on those who accept this racism; it is apostate
Christianity.

The original Scofield note was far out of line with traditional
Christianity in 1908 and should have been treated as heresy then. Yet
Scofield had failed to go far enough for the Zionists. Scofield
clearly recognized what the book of Genesis states, that the sons of
Ishmael are co-heirs to Abraham's ancient promise. Did not Scofield
say "the Israelitish people and Ishmaelitish people are...the natural
posterity of Abraham"? The Oxford Press simply waited for Scofield to
die and changed it as they wished.

And what is it that Scofield said that did not satisfy the Zionists
who rewrote the Oxford 1967 Edition?

The answer is an easy one. Most Arab and Islamic scholars consider
Arabs in general and the Prophet Mohamed in particular to be direct
descendants of Ishmael, Abraham's first son and older halfbrother of
Isaac, whose son Jacob was later to become known as "Israel." Many
Arabs believe that through Ishmael they are coheirs of to Abraham's
promise, and they correctly believe that presentday Israelis have no
Biblical right to steal their land. Jewish Talmudic folklore also
speaks of Ishmael, so the Zionists apparently felt they had to alter
how Christians viewed the two half brothers in order to prevent
Christians from siding with the Arabs over the land theft.

The Zionists solved this dilemma by inserting a senseless footnote in
the 1967 (Oxford) Scofield Reference Bible which, in effect,
substitutes the word "Jews" for the words "The Israelitish people and
Ishmaelitish people," as Scofield originally wrote it. The
Israelitish and Ishmaelitish people lived 3000 years ago, but the
Zionists want to claim the Arabs’ part of the presumed birthright
right now! Read it again; "all Jews are natural descendants of
Abraham, but are not necessarily his spiritual posterity."

And there is more of such boondogglery in the Oxford bible. On the
same page 1137 we find yet another brand new Zionist-friendly note
referring to the New Testament book of John 8:37.

"(2) 8:44 THAT THIS SATANIC FATHERHOOD CANNOT BE LIMITED TO THE
PHARISEES IS MADE CLEAR IN 1Jn3:810" (note SRB 1967 Edition, P1137 to
John 8:44)

Let us look at the verse Oxford is trying to soften, wherein Jesus is
speaking directly to the Pharisees, who were the Jewish leaders of his
day, and to no one else:

"YE ARE OF YOUR FATHER THE DEVIL, AND THE LUST OF YOUR FATHER YE WILL
DO. HE WAS A MURDERER FROM THE BEGINNING, AND ABODE NOT IN THE TRUTH,
BECAUSE THERE IS NO TRUTH IN HIM. WHEN HE SPEAKEST A LIE, HE SPEAKEST
OF HIS OWN; FOR HE IS A LIAR, AND THE FATHER OF IT." John 8:44 King
James Ed.)

Those are plain words. No wonder the Zionists wanted to dilute what
Jesus said. Not only did Oxford add a new footnote in 1967, but they
inserted no less than four reference cues into the King James sacred
text, directing readers to their specious, apostate footnotes. It
seems the Zionists cannot deny what Jesus said about Pharisees, but
they do not want to bear the burden of being "sons of Satan" all by
themselves. Now here's the text of the verse to which Oxford refers
in order to try to solve this problem:

"HE THAT COMMITETH SIN IS OF THE DEVIL; FOR THE DEVIL SINNETH FROM THE
BEGINNING. FOR THIS PURPOSE THE SON OF GOD WAS MANIFESTED, THAT HE
MIGHT DESTROY THE WORK OF THE DEVIL." (1Jn3:8.King James Edition)

Fine, but this verse, spoken by Jesus to His followers in a speech
about avoiding sin, in no way supports Oxford's argument that Jesus
was not talking directly to and about the Pharisee leaders when he
called them "Sons of Satan" in John 8:44. It is a different book
written at a different time to a different audience. This is typical
Christian Zionist diversion.

To find out to whom Jesus is speaking you must read the rest of John
8, not something from another book. Furthermore, John 8:44 is only
one of some 77 verses where Jesus confronted the Pharisees by name and
in many cases addressed them as "satanic" and as "vipers." Oxford
simply ignores most of these denunciations by Jesus, adding no notes
at all, and the Christian Zionists go along without question.

These are a few examples of Zionist perversions of scripture that have
shaped the doctrine of America's most politically powerful religious
subculture, the "Christian Zionists" as Ariel Sharon calls them, or
the dispensationalists, as intellectual followers call themselves, or
the JudeoChristians as our politically-correct politicians describe
themselves. Today's Mid-East wars are not caused by the
predisposition of the peoples, who are no more warlike than any human
tribes. Without the pandering to Jewish and Zionist interests that is
carried out by this subculture--the most vocal being the celebrity
Christian evangelists--there would be no such wars, for there is not
enough support for war outside of organized Zionist Christianity.

Reverend Stephen Sizer of Christ Church, England
(http://www.christ-church.info) is perhaps the most dedicated new
scholar writing about the Scofield Bible craze, popularly known as
Christian Zionism. He has quipped, "Judging Christianity by looking
at the American Evangelists is kind of like judging the British by
watching Benny Hill."

Reverend Sizer's remark brings to mind another Benny; his name is
Benny Hinn, not a British comic, but an American evangelist spouting
inflammatory hate-filled words aimed at Muslims everywhere. Hinn was
speaking to the applause of an aroused crowd of thousands in the
American Airline Center in Dallas when he shocked two Ft. Worth Star
Telegram religious reporters covering the July 3d event by announcing,
"We are on God's side," speaking of Palestine. He shouted, "This is
not a war between Jews and Arabs. It is a war between God and the
Devil." Lest there be any doubt about it, Hinn was talking about a
blood war in which the Israelis are "God" and the Palestinians are
"the Devil."

Benny Hinn is one of hundreds of acknowledged Christian Zionists who
have no problem spouting outright race hatred and who join in
unconditional support for Israel without regard for which or how many
of Israel's enemies are killed or crippled. His boldness stems from
his knowledge that the vast majority of professing Christians from
whom he seeks his lavish support—the Judeo-Christians, or Christian
Zionists--do not shrink at his words, because they have been
conditioned to accept them, just as Roman citizens learned to accept
Christian persecution, even burning alive, under Nero. Several
evangelists in attendance affirmed their agreement with Hinn "the
line between Christians and Muslims is the difference between good and
evil."

An amazing number of professing Christians are in agreement with the
fanatical likes of Hinn, including Gary Bauer, Ralph Reed, James
Dobson and hundreds more. Yet Hinn's profit-seeking fanaticism is not
as shocking as that of men like Richard Land of the Southern Baptist
Convention who occupy the highest positions in the area of
conservative religious thought. Land may have stopped short of
branding all Muslims as devils, but he attacked their leader and
Prophet and stated that, according to Baptist Bible interpretation,
the Palestinian people have no legal rights to property in Palestine.
(see note)

See our discussion of Southern Baptists entitled "THE CAUSE OF THE
CONFLICT: part I, Fixing Blame" http://www.whtt.org/articles/020707.htm.

The more politically conservative and libertarian the speaker
expressing hatred for Islam, the more shocking the statement sounds.
One example is Samuel Blumenfeld, a veteran textbook author and
advocate of home education. His attack on Islam in a story entitled
"Religion and Satanism" in the April 2002 conservative, Calvinist
Chalcedon Report leaves little room for civil liberties and freedom of
thought. He writes, "Islam is a religion ruled by Satan," and asks,
"Can anyone under the influence of Satan be trusted?” Blumenfeld
shows poor judgment and a lack of morality when he allows phrases such
as "willing agents of Satan," "another manifestation of Satanism" and
"the willingness of Muslims to believe blatant lies," to spill from
his pen.

How can anyone interpret these words by Land, Hinn, Blumenfeld, and
yes, our own President, as anything less than race hatred? Who would
make such generalized and transparently false statements against any
other minority except Muslims?

About 100 million American Christians need to recover their true faith
in Christ Jesus, who never denounced any individual on account of his
group. Jesus even tried to save the Pharisees, and only denounced
them when they showed themselves to be deceivers. There is not a word
in the New Testament that urges any follower of Jesus to murder one
child in Iraq or condemn Palestine to death. Race hatred is a
Zionist, not a Christian, strategy.

Christian Zionism may be the most bloodthirsty apostasy in the entire
history of Christianity or any other religion. Shame on its leaders:
they have already brought the blood of untold numbers innocent people
down upon the spires and prayer benches of America's churches.

WHTT asks every Christian to share this article with pastors and
church leaders, especially lay leaders. We ask every Muslim and Jew
who reads it to do the same. You might wish to suspend giving money
to any organizations that preach Zionist race hatred in any form,
especially under the cover Jesus Christ. And lastly, We Hold These
Truths invites your informed comments and questions. -Copyright 2002,
WHTT, may be reproduced in full with permission.

See part one of this series: "THE CAUSE OF THE CONFLICT: part I,
Fixing Blame" http://www.whtt.org/articles/020707.htm.

RESOURCES FROM WHTT BOOKSTORE ( http://www.whtt.org/catalog/default.php )

Listen to: KULTURE KLASH II, How Oxford University Press and CI
Scofield stole the Christian Bible, WHTT on tape.

THE INCREDIBLE SCOFIELD AND HIS BOOK, Joseph M. Canfield, hard cover
book.

Sherry's War: Twenty page research paper plus 1 hour audiotape by C.
E. Carlson, "How Judeo-Christians mix and match scripture verses and
use of extra text out of context to promote the Pop Church's "chosen
people" and end times scenario. Sherry and many other well-meaning,
professed Christians have justified war against Arab people without a
scrap of scriptural support and with little knowledge of the conflict.
"Sherry's War" offers insight into current Christian sub-culture and
why many have justified or ignored the brutal assassinations of
Islamic peoples simply because they are not Israelis or Christian. An
introduction to WHTT's classic 20-page study by the same name; Sent to
all contributors.

THE FINAL APOSTASY - by Gordon Ginn Ph.D. Is your church apostate,
would you know it if it were? A book that reveals the untold
historical and documented expost facto changes made in the Hebrew
text of the Old Testament...after Christ. These changes have affected
what all of us believe, from the Reformation to Day911. Ginn sheds
light on the turmoil in the Middle East and reveals the results of
some Christians' tragic errors in accepting the "Final Apostasy".
218 pages

We Hold These Truths
Strait Gate Ministries
PO Box 14491
Scottsdale AZ 85267
480 669 4862

Not on our list? Subscribe by return mail.

To be excluded from future mailings, reply, remove.
(Please write only in the Subject line)

 
 
  
  
             Move messages to.. Saved on AOL
 
     28 of 32
 

 Include original text in reply.
 
 

 
 
Received on Thu Feb 3 12:58:19 2005