How do I find out what the subject is of this posting? And the posting
itself is hard to read as well, with all the different signs in between. I
must admit that I (often) skip the postings.
Jan
At 06:52 PM 01/02/2005, Dawsonzhu@aol.com wrote:
>(JKeith Miller posted a commentary:(B
>
>(J>(B
>(JIt may be true that Sternberg is not and advocate of ID but only because
>he is much worse: he is, for instance, on the Editorial Board of the
>Occasional Papers of the Baraminology Study Group at Bryan College in
>Tennessee. This is a $B!H(Jresearch$B!I(J group devoted to the
>determination of the created kinds of Genesis. Sternberg was also a
>signatory of the Discovery Institute's $B!H(J100 Scientists Who Doubt
>Darwinism$B!I(J statement. (Klinghoffer fails to mention these rather
>salient facts.)(B
>(J<(B
>
>(JThis reminds me of what happened to the intellectuals(B
>(Jin China during the cultural revolution: signatures,(B
>(Jphotographs..... guilt by association.... (B
>
>(JEach article must be judged on its own merit. It is (B
>(Jfair to say, for anyone who has really tried to do good(B
>(Jscholarship on a manuscript, that it can never be perfect.(B
>(JWhen the word "shoddy" comes in is relative and not well (B
>(Jdefined.(B
>
>(JI don't share much agreement with ID myself, but if an(B
>(Jarticle had something interesting in it, as long as it(B
>(Jmet some reasonable criteria of scholarship (granted, (B
>(Ja not so well defined a term), it would be of (B
>(Jsome value to make it avaliable for others to see and form (B
>(Jtheir own opinions about it. That is also part of a free (B
>(Jand transparent society. (B
>
>(JDid anyone notice the bitter irony of this? A _Catholic_ who (B
>(Jis now being charged as a heretic by a new brand of ideologues(B
>(Jwho use the Galileo image as justification for rejecting the (B
>(Jinstitution. It took the Catholic church 400 years to forgive (B
>(JGalileo... Are we seeing the reverse problem happening?(B
>
>(JBy Grace alone we proceed, (indeed)(B
>(JWayne(B
Received on Tue Feb 1 20:21:59 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 01 2005 - 20:21:59 EST