Re: "perfect" nature

A. Einstein wrote:

"As a scientist, I believe that nature is a perfect structure...."

Well, we need to keep in mind that, although he was speaking "as a scientist," Albert was just expressing gut feelings. He admitted to being entranced with the beauty of his own General Relativity and other big concepts of physics and geometry. But he never was comfortable with the idea that QM and the real world were at deepest levels compatible. If he felt he had to swallow QM, he might have felt nature was a bit less than perfect.

Don

PS - I just spent an afternoon at an outstanding Einstein exhibit in LA's Skirball Cultural Center (Jewish). Spanned his entire life and range of thought. Included several hand-written original pages of manuscripts on Special and General Relativity. And copies of love notes. Was funded in part by the J. Paul Getty Foundation. I think it's going to be traveling. I recommend it if it comes to a place near you.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Randy Isaac<mailto:rmisaac@bellatlantic.net>
  To: asa@calvin.edu<mailto:asa@calvin.edu>
  Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 9:26 AM
  Subject: "perfect" nature

  A week or two ago there was a thread on this list about the meaning of "good" and "perfect" creation. With that in mind, I couldn't help but note the quote from Albert Einstein as featured on the January 2005 calendar page of the American Institute of Physics calendar:

  "As a scientist, I believe that nature is a perfect structure, seen from the standpoint of reason and logical analysis" A. Einstein to Raymond Benenson, January 31, 1946, Einstein Archives 56-505.

  We would consider the nature that he is observing to be a "post-Fall" nature, whatever that chronology might mean. Does his quote leave open the prospect that perhaps there are other standpoints from which nature is not perfect? Not that they would be illogical or unreasonable, but perhaps a spiritual perspective?

  Randy
Received on Fri Jan 28 02:21:00 2005