D. F. Siemens, Jr. wrote:
> Edward J. Hassertt wrote in part
> So, if God did supernaturally acts, then the assumptions of
> methodological naturalism are false and the foundations on which
> scientific discoveries are based are nonexistent. If God does or did
> act in the events of the universe in a supernatural way and science
> assumes a priori that such actions are not present, then if they are
> present, science will always miss describing the universe or its
> history accurately.
>
> If we a priori exclude the possibility of discovering supernatural
> signatures in science, is that really science? How can one claim that
> certain types of evidence will always be ignored or interpreted to
> mean something else just because of a presupposition of methodological
> naturalism?
>
>>
>>
> This is a typical lawyer approach, distort matters so that the unwary
> are seduced by nonsense.
This childishness is uncalled for. I did not insult you or anyone else,
I was discussing an issue. The personal attacks are not becoming a
Christian or a person over the age of 5. I await your apology if you
are Christian enough to give it.
I'll just ignore the fact that what the rest of your inane post claims
is not true of science is exactly what the person I was responding to
said was necessary for science.
-- ....................................................................................... The line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either, but right through every human heart - Alexander Solzhenitsyn ....................................................................................... Edward J. Hassertt Reason By Faith Auburn, Washington http://www.reasonbyfaith.org Christian Legal Discussion: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/advocatusdeus/Received on Sun Jan 23 23:23:34 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Jan 23 2005 - 23:23:36 EST