George Murphy wrote:
> A more serious problem is that while Hart refers to the
> Incarnation, he makes no reference to the cross as God's participation
> in the suffering of the world. While that doesn't provide a neat
> solution to the theodicy question, I'm convinced that anything said
> about the problem of suffering that doesn't appeal to the cross is
> worth little. Shalom
> George
> http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/
>
Christian to Christian that can make sense. But what do we say to
non-believers who question the "goodness" of God? I have no good answer;
do you?
Walt
===================================
Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
(Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
===================================
Received on Fri Jan 7 07:44:23 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Jan 07 2005 - 07:44:24 EST