>>It's only you and I who don't make misteaks :>).>>
Haha. Well -- you, anyway.
OK, I see better where you are coming from. You can assume inerrancy /
perfection in the original manuscripts -- and that is certainly possible.
BTW< after a lot of hemming and hawing, Safarti admitted that AIG's
definition of inerrancy was also that. I guess it is a fairly common
position to take, and is, of course, as irrefutable as Gosse's theory.
Keep at it. I appreciate you.
Burgy (your friendly critic)
www.burgy.50megs.com/h4h.htm (A Habitat for Humanity story)
________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the Internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the Web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!
Received on Tue Mar 2 13:34:27 2004
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Mar 02 2004 - 13:34:36 EST