Re: The nature of evidence

From: Sheila Wilson <sheila-wilson@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Mon Dec 15 2003 - 12:29:16 EST

I personally prefer Christian doctors and dentists because they generally have a very peaceful spirit. A dentist with a peaceful spirit goes a long way when a drill is running in your mouth!
 
Sheila
 

John W Burgeson <jwburgeson@juno.com> wrote:
>>OK, so when symptoms of a serious illness send you to the hospital for
an
MRI, how do you plan to have the evidential data interpreted? By a
competent
and scientifically trained physician, or by Ken Ham using his biblical
framework?>>

Ken Ham is not an MD, but I have known MDs who were YECs. One who treated
my young son I thought was unusually competent.

I have also heard of a US President whose wife dabbled in astrology. That
scared me.

I have a close MD friend who is a non-believer. I think I'd trust him
with my precious self if the situation called for it.

I also have an MD friend (not as close) who is a fellow Christian in my
church.

Which of these would I pick? I guess I would have to take each case as it
comes.

I had a plumber once who dealt tarot cards. But as far as I know, he did
not do so to discover where the leaks were.

I posted recently some comments along this line concerning the academics
who were on the ICR letterhead.

Interesting concept.

Burgy

www.burgy.50megs.com/change.htm (How we changed the whole world)

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

Sheila McGinty Wilson
sheila-wilson@sbcglobal.net
Received on Mon Dec 15 12:29:52 2003

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Dec 15 2003 - 12:29:53 EST