Re: So what now do we do?

Jan de Koning wrote:

> At 07:44 AM 04/12/2003 -0500, Walter Hicks wrote:
> >I have the solution to the world's energy problems (below)! etc.

I was kidding. Hope it was obvious.

>
>
> Would it not be better if we started with: how can we bring our energy
> consumption down? We (myself included) use a lot of fabricated energy,
> which is really not "needed."

I would not say "better" but certainly "in addition to". For example, in my
area, I see these big gas guzzling cars on the way to work and back each
day. Rarely is there more than one person in the car. Some decades ago, car
pooling was common. Now it is rare. If 3 people shared rides to work it
would do wonders for overall gas consumption. There are many other
examples -- but people just do not seem to care.

Walt

--
===================================
Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
(Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
===================================