>
> I think there are at least two schools of thought in the ID movement
> regarding the casual joint. Some(Johnson?) see a break in the continuous
> action of natural laws and some(Dembski from my last reading) are inclined
> to look to natural quantum indeterminacies as the source of intelligent
> activity.
>
This is not new as it was argued by my uncle Grenville Yarnold in The
spiritual Crisis of the Scientific Age (1959) and William Pollard in 1962.
Both were anglican priests cum physicists.
If Dembski is saying this then he has rejected ID
Michael
Received on Tue Dec 2 02:24:13 2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Dec 02 2003 - 02:24:13 EST