Re: Wells and Molecular Phylogenies

From: Preston Garrison (garrisonp@uthscsa.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 31 2003 - 00:15:49 EST

  • Next message: Peter Ruest: "Complexity increase (was: Re: Phillip Johnson (and Methodological Naturalism))"

    >I think Wells' critique of molecular phylogenies will be much harder
    >to sustain after papers like this (Nature 425, 798 - 804 (23 October
    >2003):
    >
    >Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies

    Phylogenies can also be resolved by using complex mutations such as
    transposon insertions in particular locations. The paper below, which
    appeared this week, is a nice example using Alu elements in the
    primate lineage. They analyzed 133 Alu insertions and all but one
    were consistent with only one tree. The one exception, which put
    gorilla and human together with chimps branching earlier, instead of
    gorilla being more distant than chimps, is attributable to random
    fixation of an element that was polymorphic in the population at the
    time of branching off of gorillas.

    ----------
    Alu elements and hominid phylogenetics
    PNAS October 28, 2003 vol. 100 no. 22 p. 12791

    Abdel-Halim Salem*Ýý, David A. Ray*ý, Jinchuan Xing*, Pauline A.
    Callinan*, Jeremy S. Myers*, Dale J. Hedges*, Randall K. Garber*,
    David J. Witherspoon§, Lynn B. Jorde§, and Mark A. Batzer*¶

    Alu elements have inserted in primate genomes throughout the
    evolution of the order. One particular Alu lineage (Ye) began
    amplifying relatively early in hominid evolution and continued
    propagating at a low level as many of its members are found in a
    variety of hominid genomes. This study represents the first
    conclusive application of short interspersed elements, which are
    considered nearly homoplasy-free, to elucidate the phylogeny of
    hominids. Phylogenetic analysis of Alu Ye5 elements and elements from
    several other subfamilies reveals high levels of support for
    monophyly of Hominidae, tribe Hominini and subtribe Hominina. Here we
    present the strongest evidence reported to date for a sister
    relationship between humans and chimpanzees while clearly
    distinguishing the chimpanzee and human lineages.
    ------------

    The fact that the same type of transposon is inserted at exactly the
    same location in different species is itself powerful evidence for
    common descent, and this kind of pattern, where the transposon is
    present in a species pattern that is exactly what is expected based
    on a phylogenetic tree determined by other means - I can't think of
    any hypothesis from a special creation viewpoint that accounts for
    it, other than "God just did it that way."

    The same sort of evidence comes up in another recent paper. Francis
    Collins used data from this paper in his paper in the Sept. issue of
    PSCF (the ASA journal):

    --------------
    Comparative analyses of multi-species sequences from targeted genomic regions
    NATURE VOL 424, 14 AUGUST 2003, p. 788

    The systematic comparison of genomic sequences from different
    organisms represents a central focus of contemporary genome analysis.
    Comparative analyses of vertebrate sequences can identify coding and
    conserved non-coding regions, including regulatory elements, and
    provide insight into the forces that have rendered modern-day
    genomes. As a complement to whole-genome sequencing efforts we are
    sequencing and comparing targeted genomic regions in multiple,
    evolutionarily diverse vertebrates. Here we report the generation and
    analysis of over 12 megabases (Mb) of sequence from 12 species, all
    derived from the genomic region orthologous to a segment of about 1.8
    Mb on human chromosome 7 containing ten genes, including the gene
    mutated in cystic fibrosis. These sequences show conservation
    reflecting both functional constraints and the neutral mutational
    events that shaped this genomic region. In particular, we identify
    substantial numbers of conserved non-coding segments beyond those
    previously identified experimentally, most of which are not
    detectable by pair-wise sequence comparisons alone. Analysis of
    transposable element insertions highlights the variation in genome
    dynamics among these species and confirms the placement of rodents as
    a sister group to the primates.

    Preston G.

    Preston Garrison, Ph.D.
    Instructor
    UTHSCSA
    Biochem. Dept. MSC 7760 Insert the usual disclaimers here.
    7703 Floyd Curl Dr.
    San Antonio, TX 78229-3900
    garrisonp@uthscsa.edu
    210-567-3702
    http://biochem.uthscsa.edu/~barnes

    -- 
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 31 2003 - 00:16:27 EST