Re: Wells and Molecular Phylogenies

From: Michael Roberts (michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk)
Date: Wed Oct 29 2003 - 02:54:34 EST

  • Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Homosexuality/(heterosexuality) thread"

    Why does Paul reject the biblical reasons for rejecting a Young Earth?. He
    is not convincing.

    Give him my regards tonight and say I want to push him to be logical!

    Michael
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Ted Davis" <TDavis@messiah.edu>
    To: "John W Burgeson" <jwburgeson@juno.com>;
    <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
    Cc: <asa@calvin.edu>
    Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 9:57 PM
    Subject: Re: Wells and Molecular Phylogenies

    > Paul admits that the evidence against YEC is extensive, that his position
    > presently is not well supported by science, and that he holds it for
    > biblical reasons. I respect this honesty, and his right to place his
    > understanding of scripture over his understanding of science.
    >
    > I have problems with those who are not honest about this, those who claim
    > that science strongly supports a young earth when they know full well that
    > most of the evidence does not naturally point in that direction.
    >
    > ted
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 29 2003 - 04:12:34 EST