From: Sarah Berel-Harrop (sec@hal-pc.org)
Date: Mon Oct 27 2003 - 19:29:33 EST
----- Original Message -----
From: "John W Burgeson" <jwburgeson@juno.com>
To: <bnelson301@yahoo.com>
Cc: <asa@calvin.edu>
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:34 AM
Subject: Re: Wells and Molecular Phylogenies
>
> I agree. I am still thinking about my label of "roster of shame" that I
> used recently. I am not convinced that in using that phrase I am
> attacking or mocking people -- but more and more I see that as a close
> call.
Well I would not use that language myself. Here is
why: You get off on a tangent about an insult when
the point is that they are just wrong. Gordon's
observation was quite cogent, IMV.
But, really, what about the ICR's smears of
'evolutionists'? What makes burgy's 'roster
of shame' unacceptable and the ICR's exhibits
ok?
See:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icr-visit/linke.html
Exhibit 10
and
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icr-visit/bartelt6.html#evolutionists
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.532 / Virus Database: 326 - Release Date: 10/27/2003
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 27 2003 - 19:24:24 EST