Re: Texas debates handling of evolution in textbooks (fwd)

From: Sarah Berel-Harrop (sec@hal-pc.org)
Date: Sat Oct 11 2003 - 18:31:37 EDT

  • Next message: allenroy: "Re: interpretation"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Michael Roberts" <michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk>
    To: "Pattle Pak Toe Pun" <Pattle.P.Pun@wheaton.edu>; <asa@calvin.edu>
    Sent: Saturday, October 11, 2003 3:08 PM
    Subject: Re: Texas debates handling of evolution in textbooks (fwd)

    > Why is Discovery Institute distributing such a bad book as Icons of
    > Evolution?
    >

    Michael, you might be interested to know that the
    "analysis" of textbooks up for adoption was based
    on Icons. Essentially, all the DI big guns came to
    Austin this September to ask the Texas State Board
    of Education to reject textbooks that did not
    incorporate "Icons"-style criticisms in the textbooks,
    and that includes the peppered moth. Incidentally
    devo biologists get pretty hot over the recapitulation
    nonsense from Wells. So it's not just you or the
    peppered moth people, it's pretty much every
    knowledgeable person in each field that Icons purports
    to debunk. If ID has a research program, they should
    be doing that, not lending support to Icons. Makes it
    look like the 'politics' is eclipsing the 'science'.

    Additionally, the DI people made statements to the
    SBOE that were misleading & flat-out wrong, and also
    made a big deal in the local press that they were not
    permitted to testify (Wells, West, Chapman, & Behe
    were permitted to address the board after the hearing)
    but they fail to mention that no fewer than four - maybe
    five DI fellows did in fact testify & that in the first few
    hours & sympathetic board members circulated their
    written testimony as well. So they were getting trying
    to get mileage on a persecution charge in the press
    using counterfactual information.

    These tactics are just repugnant, that's all I can say,
    it gets me pretty worked up.

    ---
    Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
    Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
    Version: 6.0.524 / Virus Database: 321 - Release Date: 10/06/2003
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 11 2003 - 18:24:33 EDT