Re: RATE

From: Fivefree@aol.com
Date: Wed Oct 08 2003 - 23:13:38 EDT

  • Next message: allenroy: "Re: Questions to Allen Roy"

    In a message dated 10/8/2003 4:05:35 PM Mountain Standard Time,
    jaywillingham@cfl.rr.com writes:
    Of course when I suggest creation might have included
    isotopes of all ages, I get told God would not fool scientists and if he did
    he is unworthy of worship, a position I find almost blasphemous.

    Jay Willingham
    I also think that this is a foolish statement 'God would not fool scientists
    and if he did
    he is unworthy of worship.' If creation isn't formed like I think it should
    be than I quit. God says that he is honest, true and never, ever changes. He
    does not fool anybody.

    I have observed many here (and on other lists) who want hard answers in
    response to a YEC position. Hundreds of billions (if not trillions) of dollars have
    been spent on OE investigation and modeling by oil companies, universities,
    governments, etc. Thousands have been spent on creational modeling's. To expect
    complex answers to complex problems 'off the cuff' is extraordinary to say
    the least.

    The present may not be the key to the past. Nobody knows. I recall an
    undergrad independent study (a 6 hour presentation!!) I did on the Geology of
    Wyoming. The 1940s AAPG issues I read where mountain chain formation was caused by
    the slow cooling of the earth and the planet was shriveling like a raisin. State
    of the art science at that time. Thousands of feet of Dolomites in the early
    Paleozoic compared to other segments of the geologic column. Nobody knows why.
    Present geologic thought might someday be thrown on its ear by some new
    revelation, maybe it is trying to be right now but academic smothering and inertia
    is preventing it. Anybody remember Alfred Wegener? Maybe plate tectonics isn't
    real after all, who knows. Can it explain India breaking off from the super
    continent, drifting east and then taking a hard left turn and ramming Eurasia?
    No, it can't. If it can't explain that mechanism then it is an incomplete
    theory with flaws. Always keep it in the back of your mind that you could be
    wrong. Dogmatism breeds stagnation in humanity.
               
    So please back off YEC'ers some. Asking for all answers to all questions in
    Geology/Biology makes you look like Gray Davis in the Calif. election. Know it
    alls with a chip on your shoulder, and mean. Almost all in the pew accept YEC.
    Maybe they all know something perceptually (spiritually if you will) that the
    trained scientific mind cannot discern due to its training. Virtually all
    science assumes there is no God of the bible. We all know that and it is a basic
    assumption of all modern science. Perhaps we have been immersed in scientific
    reasoning procedures and deductions for so long we can't think in any path but
    the one we've been trained in. An established paradigm is the killer of
    science whether it is AAAS, YEC, GSA or whoever.

    Jack Jackson



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 10 2003 - 12:23:03 EDT