Re: Not RATE (Was RE: Rate)

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Fri Oct 10 2003 - 07:53:36 EDT

Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Not RATE (Was RE: Rate)"

Previous message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Not RATE (Was RE: Rate)"
Maybe in reply to: George Murphy: "Not RATE (Was RE: Rate)"
Next in thread: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Not RATE (Was RE: Rate)"
Next in thread: allenroy: "Walking With God"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 10/9/03 8:39:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time, gmurphy@raex.com
writes:

> Is it a conciliar statement or what?
>

It is from the tome of damasus - a collection of the principal Christological
and Trinitarian errors of the 3rd - 4th centuries - it is stated in the
negative - if anyone denies... [the stated truth]... he is a heretic

rich

Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Not RATE (Was RE: Rate)"
Previous message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Not RATE (Was RE: Rate)"
Maybe in reply to: George Murphy: "Not RATE (Was RE: Rate)"
Next in thread: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Not RATE (Was RE: Rate)"
Next in thread: allenroy: "Walking With God"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 10 2003 - 07:53:57 EDT