From: Walter Hicks (wallyshoes@mindspring.com)
Date: Fri Oct 10 2003 - 06:31:57 EDT
allenroy wrote:
> Walter Hicks wrote:
>
> > That only proves my contention, Allen. You do everything except answer the questions I pose. So I will say
> > them again.:
>
> Since are incapable of looking beyond the end of your nose and dont know the difference between search engine
> and a jet engine, I've done your work for you.
>
> http://www.christiananswers.net/q-aig/aig-c006.html
> How did animals get from the Ark to isolated places, such as Australia?
>
> http://www.creationevidence.org/cemframes.html?http%3A//www.creationevidence.org/qustn_mon/qustn_mon.html
> How did kangaroos get from Australia to the ark and back again?
>
> http://cgca.net/pabco/inthebeg.htm
> "In the Beginning..." Answers to Questions from Genesis
Nice try, Allen.
The questions were not about kangaroos --- and the answers on those sites are really awful. Yes, you have clearly
proven to me that you can find a website to generate an excuse for any bizarre belief that you might have.
Actually, I did know that without your help because I have reviewed these sites before.
However, you twice ignored the questions I asked. Care to try again or is active avoidance the only tool you have
left?
What I sent to you was:
> Glenn's assessment is probably correct in that no fact or data could ever change your view. If I am wrong,
> could you tell me what data might? If I am not wrong, then what is the purpose behind any discussion?
>
You have ignored it twice.
I guess your search engine does not work for questions that have to be answered by you personally. :)
Walt
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Oct 10 2003 - 06:32:18 EDT