From: Jay Willingham (jaywillingham@cfl.rr.com)
Date: Thu Oct 09 2003 - 17:59:28 EDT
----- Original Message -----
From: Fivefree@aol.com
To: asa@calvin.edu
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2003 5:36 PM
Subject: Fwd: Phillip Johnson
In a message dated 10/9/2003 1:17:51 PM Mountain Standard Time, jwburgeson@juno.com writes:
Phil's primary error, IMHO, is not understanding that philosophical
naturalism (the universe is all there is) and methodological naturalism
(science is a game which investigates causality as if no gods exist) are
two very separate ideas.
I don't understand the difference here either. Could you elaborate?
Jack Jackson
Sounds like philosophical naturalism assumes there is no God, and methodological naturalism assumes nothing.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Oct 09 2003 - 17:58:30 EDT