From: Walter Hicks (wallyshoes@mindspring.com)
Date: Thu Oct 09 2003 - 11:10:12 EDT
allenroy wrote:
>
> > You ignored my question about kangaroos in Australia -- why?
>
> This one has been addressed by Flood Cataclysmist many times over and can be found by a simple
> search on the internet. I'm sure AiG has something on it.
I once had a friend who was strongly opposed to the nuclear plant under construction in Seabrook N.H..
In the middle of one his tirades, I asked him a question to substantiate that he knew what he was
talking about. He admitted that he did not know, but that the real reason was that he hated big
business and the way they "stuff things down people's throats". In other words, he was a confirmed
liberal operating off of a canned philosophy without regard for any data and would not objectively
evaluate the entire picture..
It strikes me that you are operating in a similar fashion. You are a Flood Cataclysmist and that is
the end of the story. If you do not know the answer, you are sure that someone else does. Glenn's
assessment is probably correct in that no fact or data could ever change your view. If I am wrong,
could you tell me what data might? If I am not wrong, then what is the purpose behind any discussion?
Walt
-- =================================== Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>In any consistent theory, there must exist true but not provable statements. (Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic If you have already found the truth without it. (G.K. Chesterton) ===================================
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Oct 09 2003 - 11:10:22 EDT