Re: Original Sin (was Re: RATE)

From: Walter Hicks (wallyshoes@mindspring.com)
Date: Mon Oct 06 2003 - 22:29:49 EDT

  • Next message: George Murphy: "Re: Original Sin (was Re: RATE)"

    Although I seldom agree with agree with Glenn on a lot of details ----- without a fall
    from grace, there seems to be a lot missing from theology (as have been given to understand
    it.)

    What is the opinion of other theologians on this list?

    Walt

    George Murphy wrote:

    >
    > Come on Glenn! This is the old YEC/anti-evolution tactic of citing
    > non-Christians evolutionists as theological experts when they talk about the dire
    > theological consequences of evolution - as if they accept their expertise on anything
    > else. Why should H.G. Wells (H,G. Wells! He wasn't even an expert on science, let alone
    > theology.) be considered an authority on these matters?--

    ===================================
    Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>

    In any consistent theory, there must
    exist true but not provable statements.
    (Godel's Theorem)

    You can only find the truth with logic
    If you have already found the truth
    without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
    ===================================



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 06 2003 - 22:29:43 EDT