Re: Original Sin (was Re: RATE)

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Mon Oct 06 2003 - 18:05:46 EDT

  • Next message: Alexanian, Moorad: "RE: Original Sin (was Re: RATE)"

    In a message dated 10/6/03 5:32:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
    rjschn39@bellsouth.net writes:

    > Explaining such an empirical observation has become a differently framed
    > issue in some areas of Christian and non-Christian thought, one that falls
    > into the realm of *theory*. Freud offered us the "Id." Evolutionary
    > thought has opened speculation as to what degree our behavior is the product
    > of an evolutionary development. I don't find Freud's model of psycho-sexual
    > development convincing. But I do think theology needs to take seriously the
    > implications of evolutionary thought on the emergence of the human species,
    > as it seeks to articulate a notion of sin in the light of all that has been
    > learned about human beings in the last 100 years. The doctrine of the
    > "fall"/"original sin" has had its various formulations throughout the
    > history of Christian thought. I think the time is ripe for another major
    > look at it.
    >
    > Bob Schneider
    >
    >
    >

    Yes, and I have taken a fresh look at it incorporating man's evolutionary
    development and considering the scope of knowledge available to the ancients.
    Paper available upon request.

    rich faussette



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Oct 06 2003 - 18:05:58 EDT