Re: RATE

From: Walter Hicks (wallyshoes@mindspring.com)
Date: Wed Oct 01 2003 - 23:07:40 EDT

Next message: allenroy: "Re: An interesting case study"

Previous message: Jay Willingham: "Re: RATE"
In reply to: Jay Willingham: "Re: RATE"
Next in thread: George Murphy: "Re: RATE"
Next in thread: Darryl Maddox: "Re: RATE"
Reply: George Murphy: "Re: RATE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Jay,

George Murphy often does,

I (for one) often fail l to agree with him on that
score

Walt

Jay Willingham wrote:

> Can we, as Christians, discount the miraculous?
>
> Jay Willingham
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "George Murphy" <gmurphy@raex.com>
>
> It's just the "It's a miracle" claim again.

--
===================================
Walt Hicks <wallyshoes@mindspring.com>
In any consistent theory, there must
exist true but not provable statements.
(Godel's Theorem)
You can only find the truth with logic
If you have already found the truth
without it. (G.K. Chesterton)
===================================

Next message: allenroy: "Re: An interesting case study"
Previous message: Jay Willingham: "Re: RATE"
In reply to: Jay Willingham: "Re: RATE"
Next in thread: George Murphy: "Re: RATE"
Next in thread: Darryl Maddox: "Re: RATE"
Reply: George Murphy: "Re: RATE"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Oct 01 2003 - 23:07:27 EDT