RE: The Aphenomenon of Abiogenesis

From: Josh Bembenek (jbembe@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 10:10:15 EDT

  • Next message: Howard J. Van Till: "Re: The Aphenomenon of Abiogenesis"

    ID never defines what it means to be ID'd. Dembski's assertion that
    probabilities less than 10^-150 means it is designed is absolutely silly.
    The probability that the molecules in my room are arranged exactly as they
    are right now, is much less than 10^-150, yet we wouldn't claim that God
    designed the ordering of the molecules in my room, would we???  If we did
    that, then we are forced to the strong pre-determinism in which everything
    is personally controlled and discharged by God--everything, including the
    movement of molecules.  There probably are those that would hold that
    position, but why couldn't God create laws and delegate the governance of
    molecules to those laws?

    That's why they call it complex, SPECIFIED, information.

    Do you always have to misrepresent others in order to try and shred their
    arguments?

    _________________________________________________________________
    Add photos to your messages with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
    http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 10:10:29 EDT