From: Cmekve@aol.com
Date: Wed Jul 30 2003 - 20:36:39 EDT
In a message dated 7/30/03 12:59:14 PM Mountain Standard Time,
gmurphy@raex.com writes:
[snip]
<< I thought it was very good. I missed most of the special session
on divine action (caught only Terry's paper) because I was involved with the
cosmology discussions. I'm glad that ID did not seem to be a defining issue for
folks there. Certainly there are varying views on that in the ASA
but I hope we can continue to avoid being sharply divided along party lines.
>>
Agreed. I don't think I heard the word "ID" used the whole time. However, I
was struck that there is a distinction between those people who expect to see
"God's fingerprints" abounding and those who don't (I emphasize that the
"fingerprint people" include non-IDers). Did this strike anyone else? It would
be interesting to know if there are denominational correlations.
I was also somewhat appalled to hear Hugh Ross list twenty or so passages
throughout the Bible supposedly giving detailed scientific cosmological
information. Guess I'm not a "fingerprint" kind of guy!
BTW, the weather cooled off considerably once the rest of you attendees left
town!
Karl
************************
Karl V. Evans
cmekve@aol.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 30 2003 - 20:37:15 EDT