Re: homosexuality & holy war (was Re: Sin?)

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Wed Jul 30 2003 - 07:33:08 EDT

  • Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Book review of Darwin's Cathedral (D.S. Wilson)"

    In a message dated 7/29/03 10:10:54 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
    gmurphy@raex.com writes:

    > I'm sure that your arguments seem clear to yourself and that you think
    > you're
    > being civil but I assure you that that isn't how it appears to others. As I
    > said, I
    > didn't think it would be helpful to continue the debate & you've confirmed
    > my view. I
    > will not respond to any further posts of yours on any topic.
    >

    You managed the debate as long as you could, made no headway and now resort
    to two tactics, withdrawing from the field displaying a thinly veiled contempt
    and suggesting that the weight of public opinion is against me.
    If public opinion were important to religionists we'd still be sacrificing
    sheep at the Temple.
    I did not seek you out personally. You made some egregious errors regarding
    homosexuality and then tried to modify your argument to suit. Errors like that
    require a response.
    I enjoyed the exchange and look forward to your next attempt to dilute
    religiosity.
    rich faussette



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 30 2003 - 07:33:43 EDT