From: Richard McGough (richard@biblewheel.com)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 15:22:40 EDT
To avoid confusion, its important to note that the last two posts are from July 24 - one from Jim Armstrong and one from myself. They have both been answered.
But while I'm here, I would like to clarify my point to George written this morning in post:
http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/200307/0614.html
George had written:
> The "phenomenon that Science can't explain" is the emergence of terrestrial life
>between ~ 3 & 4 billion years ago.
>
To which I replied:
---Quote----
I'm sorry to belabour the point, but my argument has nothing to do with the universally recognized fact that life had a beginning on earth.
My point is that there is no evidence for abiogenesis, which I take to be defined as "the emergence of life from non-living matter through natural processes."
--- End Quote----
I would like to reiterate the clarification that the my point is *not* about what science can or can not explain. My point is about the lack of *evidence* for a hypothetical phenomenon.
Richard Amiel McGough
Discover the sevenfold symmetric perfection of the Holy Bible at http://www.BibleWheel.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 29 2003 - 15:28:26 EDT