Re: Sin?

From: Charles Carrigan (cwcarrig@umich.edu)
Date: Fri Jul 25 2003 - 13:31:11 EDT

  • Next message: richard@biblewheel.com: "Re: Sin? Reply to Richard"

    All,

    There is an article in the NYTimes today related to this issue at:

    http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/25/national/25GAYS.html?th

    Opposition to Gay Marriage Is Declining, Study Finds.

    Opposition to gay marriage has dropped significantly among Americans in
    recent years, according to a new poll by the Pew Research Center for the
    People and the Press.

    At 03:17 PM 7/23/2003 -0400, you wrote:
    >John W Burgeson wrote:
    > >
    > > George, writing to Bob DeHaan, said: "My own view at this point is an
    > > intermediate one which, I fear, will satisfy
    > > very few. Homosexuality is not part of God's basic intention for
    > > creation but, for
    > > various reasons, it is a reality that some persons do have a fundamental
    > > homosexual
    > > orientation that they have not chosen. The best way for both church and
    > > state to deal
    > > with this is to recognize (though perhaps in different ways) the
    > > legitimacy and legal
    > > status of committed 1-1 homosexual relationships, though they would not
    > > be considered
    > > "marriage." "
    > >
    > > That much is satisfactory. For a church to do this, such persons ought to
    > > be admitted as full members, and eligible as such to hold any church
    > > office.
    >
    > Well, no. There are many other people who are admitted to full
    > membership in
    >the church but who for various reasons will not be approved for
    >ordination. Ordination
    >is not a "right" that all Christians have. Whether or not a person is to
    >serve in the
    >pastoral office is not finally determined by that person thinking that he
    >or she should
    >be a pastor but by the call of the church.
    >
    > > At present my church (PCUSA) and, I think, your church (ELCA) will admit
    > > such persons as members but denies them eligibility to serve in ordained
    > > offices, thus making them, in a sense, 2nd class members.
    >
    > A foreign-born citizen of the United States is not a "2d class
    > citizen" but
    >he/she cannot be president.
    >
    > > My guess is that this will change, but the change will not come for
    > > another 5 or 10 years. In the meanwhile, some people will suffer.
    >
    >
    > & if the change comes it will have a devastating effect at least
    > on the ELCA and
    >many people will suffer.
    >
    > Shalom,
    > George
    >
    >George L. Murphy
    >gmurphy@raex.com
    >http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/

    ______________________________________________
    Charles W. Carrigan
    Univ. of Michigan - Department of Geological Sciences
    2534 C.C. Little Bldg.
    425 E. University Ave.
    Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1063
    <mailto:cwcarrig@umich.edu>cwcarrig@umich.edu
    fax: (734) 763-4690
    <http://www-personal.umich.edu/~cwcarrig/>http://www-personal.umich.edu/~cwcarrig/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 25 2003 - 13:31:43 EDT