From: Howard J. Van Till (hvantill@chartermi.net)
Date: Thu Jul 24 2003 - 09:55:42 EDT
>> As I see it, this is not an argument at all. It appears to be nothing but a
>> reassertion of faith in RFEP.
>
> In the context of this thread, OK. I don't recall claiming any more than that.
In re-reading this, I think I misunderstood your point here.
As I recall, I was primarily concerned to point out the ambiguity of ID re
what kind of action "intelligent design" really is (Mind/planning action
before time, or hand-like form-conferring intervention in time). My
references to RFEP were there to illustrate that ambiguity. I did not
attempt to justify my RFEP in that context.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 24 2003 - 09:57:39 EDT