From: richard@biblewheel.com
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 20:53:18 EDT
Hi George.
In post http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/200307/0503.html you cited an
article in Perspectives, March 2001, "Chiasmic Cosmology and Creation's
Functional Integrity." Is this available online?
Also, I would be interested in your take on my formulation of the argument
in post http://www.calvin.edu/archive/asa/200307/0514.html. Here's the gist
of it:
>1) Observations reveal fine-tuning of the universe (Tegmark even takes
>this for granted).
>2) Observations of biogenesis have never occurred.
>ID Theory conforms to both observations #1 and #2.
>RFEP Theory conforms only to #1 and asserts quite
>optimistically that observations will "someday" support biogenesis.
>ID is therefore more in accord with current scientific observations.
Do you think this is a good argument? If not, why not?
Thanks,
Richard Amiel McGough
Discover the sevenfold symmetric perfection of the Holy Bible at
http://www.BibleWheel.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 20:49:53 EDT