Re: Sin?

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 19:56:43 EDT

  • Next message: Walter Hicks: "Re: Sin?"

    In a message dated 7/23/03 4:35:19 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
    richard@biblewheel.com writes:

    > But I never thought of this as a *technique* of conforming to the law. Faith
    > in God through Christ is the only way to heaven. Is this what you mean by
    > "conformation to the Law?" If not, then it would seem that your argument has
    > a fatal flaw. What I mean is that all the good works in the world, all the
    > conformation to the law, will NEVER get you into heaven because the works of
    > the Law can be done faithlessly by those who hate God and have no faith. The
    > central issue is faith and the Bible consistently contrasts that with
    > conformaty to the law. These are the issues that must be addressed if your
    > argument is to advance amongst Gospel Christians.
    >
    >

    I can't argue with you. for two reasons. Catholics and Protestants fight over
    that very issue. We say faith and works. I think some of you or all of you
    say faith alone, but its splitting hairs. If you have the faith, you do the
    works, although I agree outwardly good works does not indicate inner faith.

    Some of my terminology is precisely technical so I can avoid cultural
    trappings and talk about all religions. I have thought of conforming to the Law as a
    technique because a technique existed for it prior to Jesus demonstrating it
    and exists in every major religion. But in order to explain that I would have
    to go through the significance of Melchizedek and take you back to the rg veda
    and I risk losing you completely.

    Before the conquest of the indus valley by the Indo-Aryans who created a
    tripartite social structure based on cattle sacrifice (the Levites later also
    sacrifice cattle) to rule their subjects, pastoralists had no stratified
    structure. Each family patriarch was priest and king. when the indus valley was
    conquered and the aryans created tripartition and specialized as priests or kings in
    order to rule efficiently, a basic rupture in man's functionality before God
    was realized and the caste system evolved out of that. The Persians duplicated
    that rupture in Zorostrianism. Early Judaism drew heavily on Zoroastrianism
    (Ezra who edited and reread the law after the return from exile was a babylonian
    priest under Persian rulers) and acquired the tripartite structure we know as
    the Temple sacrificial system which also had the "chosen" (ruler) and the
    "goyim"(ruled). Jesus demonstrated that the Law should be written on the heart,
    made tripartition obsolete and repaired the rupture. But that wasn't the only
    place the rupture was repaired. In India, a Brahmin repaired the rupture
    intellectually. He began to teach it but he didn't demonstrate it in direct
    defiance of the caste system which was an outgrowth of tripartition as Jesus had
    defied tripartion in the west. His followers taught techniques for self
    discipline to get them to "enlightenment." Each technique, east and west, has as its
    object, the self sacrifice. In fact, a few zen koans are remarkably similar to
    Jesus' parables. So, you never thought of the self sacrifice as a technique. I
    learned to see it as a technique when I read the Vedas and studied the
    development of Buddhism. The finest technique is Zen. It proffers mastery of the
    body. Zen has no theology. Only technique, so it doesn't conflict with
    Christianity. It's like a manual for doing the will of the Father, but it doesn't call
    it self anything.

    The defeat of tripartition and the reunion of priest and king is assumed in
    the universality of Christianity where there is no social structure of ruler
    and ruled making everybody inherently sacred and not "relatively" sacred
    according to function as in Hinduism and Judaism.

    solomon knew the tribes didn't want the sacrificial system or a stratified
    social structure. family patriarchs wanted to maintain their independence and
    fully function as priest/kings before God. That's why solomon had the
    interpolation regarding melchizedek put in genesis. read genesis 14 with 14:19-21
    included and then read it again without it. It reads perfectly without it.

    rich



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 19:57:00 EDT