Re: Sin?

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 18:57:43 EDT

  • Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Sin?"

    In a message dated 7/23/03 1:42:31 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
    jwburgeson@juno.com writes:

    > At present my church (PCUSA) and, I think, your church (ELCA) will admit
    > such persons as members but denies them eligibility to serve in ordained
    > offices, thus making them, in a sense, 2nd class members.
    >
    > My guess is that this will change, but the change will not come for
    > another 5 or 10 years. In the meanwhile, some people will suffer.
    >
    >

    Ah, then you have noticed the progressive liberalization of the churches and
    the move away from true religion to post modern socializing. You church has it
    right NOW. They are second class. The married couples with children are the
    first class. But the agenda doesn't want to honor traditional marriage. and
    that's where you're wrong. Homosexuality is functionally and biologically second
     class, an alternate and non-reproductive life style and calling it
    something else does not make it so. What are these people suffering from? From not
    getting what they want? Join the club.

    rich faussette



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 18:58:42 EDT