Re: Sin?

From: John W Burgeson (jwburgeson@juno.com)
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 13:26:18 EDT

  • Next message: John W Burgeson: "Re: Sin?"

    George, writing to Bob DeHaan, said: "My own view at this point is an
    intermediate one which, I fear, will satisfy
    very few. Homosexuality is not part of God's basic intention for
    creation but, for
    various reasons, it is a reality that some persons do have a fundamental
    homosexual
    orientation that they have not chosen. The best way for both church and
    state to deal
    with this is to recognize (though perhaps in different ways) the
    legitimacy and legal
    status of committed 1-1 homosexual relationships, though they would not
    be considered
    "marriage." "

    That much is satisfactory. For a church to do this, such persons ought to
    be admitted as full members, and eligible as such to hold any church
    office.

    At present my church (PCUSA) and, I think, your church (ELCA) will admit
    such persons as members but denies them eligibility to serve in ordained
    offices, thus making them, in a sense, 2nd class members.

    My guess is that this will change, but the change will not come for
    another 5 or 10 years. In the meanwhile, some people will suffer.

    John Burgeson (Burgy)

    www.burgy.50megs.com

    ________________________________________________________________
    The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
    Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
    Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 13:41:52 EDT