Re: Cambrian Explosion

From: richard@biblewheel.com
Date: Wed Jul 23 2003 - 11:52:16 EDT

  • Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Clarification -- Re: Dawkins dissembles?"

    Hi Howard,

    You present your argument as a criticism of how IDers change the definition
    of ID. But I don't think this is what is really going on at all. Your
    argument actually seems to be about the kind of Universe we live in. It
    seems to boil down to saying God could not or would not create a Universe
    where these two statements are both true:

    1) The Universe had to be fine-tuned for life-supporting chemistry, stars,
    etc.
    2) The Universe could not produce life on its own.

    As I see it, this is not an argument at all. It appears to be nothing but a
    reassertion of faith in RFEP. I see absolutely nothing logically
    inconsistent between propositions #1 and #2. Neither do I see any evidence
    that contradicts either #1 or #2. In fact, our current state of knowledge
    supports both #1 (fine-tuning has been observed) and #2 (biogenesis has
    never been observed).

    B'Shem El Elyon,
    Richard
    Discover the sevenfold symmetric perfection of the Holy Bible at
    http://www.BibleWheel.com



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 11:49:15 EDT