Re: Sin?

From: George Murphy (gmurphy@raex.com)
Date: Tue Jul 22 2003 - 15:16:43 EDT

  • Next message: Iain Strachan: "Re: the hydrogen economy"

    RFaussette@aol.com wrote:
    >
    > In a message dated 7/22/03 8:21:51 AM Eastern Daylight Time, gmurphy@raex.com
    > writes:
    >
    > > But if that's all Christianity
    > > is then its fundamental claims are false.
    > >
    >
    > I didn't say that's all Christianity is - you did. Think real hard. If there
    > are no metaphysics, the Law still maintains your family, tribe or nation.
    > That's the biology. If there are metaphysics, then the same Law gets you into
    > heaven. So, eureka, in each case the behaviors are precisely the same, the ones
    > that guarantee survival, and the ones that save your soul. So, instead of
    > intellectualizing about things neither you nor I can have proof for, or twisting
    > the religion out of shape to conform to the post modern liberal mindset, obey
    > the Law as people have been doing for thousands of years and the rest takes care
    > of itself, biologically and metaphysically. Either way, you win.
    >
    > rich faussette
    >
    > ---------------------------------------------------------------
    > In a message dated 7/22/03 8:21:51 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
    > gmurphy@raex.com writes:
    >
    > But if that's all Christianity
    > is then its fundamental claims are false.
    >
    > I didn't say that's all Christianity is - you did.

            False. Please note the word "if."
            & if (as we seem to agree) that _isn't_ all Christianity is then the arguments
    you present are not compelling. (Note that I do not say "are /ipso facto/ false.")
    Christianity did indeed develop from the kind of social & religious context you
    describe. But Christianity did in fact _develop_ & is not identical with that social &
    religious context, so that not everything from that context is necessary - & in some
    cases even possible - for adequate Christian faith today.
            Please note again that I am not arguing here for acceptance of homosexual
    activity, but only that the arguments you present against it do not settle the matter
    for Christian theology & ethics.

    > Think real hard. If
    > there are no metaphysics, the Law still maintains your family, tribe
    > or nation. That's the biology. If there are metaphysics, then the same
    > Law gets you into heaven.

            The law never gets anyone into heaven. See Romans 3:20.

    > So, eureka, in each case the behaviors are
    > precisely the same, the ones that guarantee survival, and the ones
    > that save your soul. So, instead of intellectualizing about things
    > neither you nor I can have proof for, or twisting the religion out of
    > shape to conform to the post modern liberal mindset, obey the Law as
    > people have been doing for thousands of years and the rest takes care
    > of itself, biologically and metaphysically. Either way, you win.

            Christianity is about saving whole people, not simply "souls," & my interest in
    conforming to the post modern liberal mindset is precisely zero.

                                                            Shalom,
                                                            George
     
    George L. Murphy
    gmurphy@raex.com
    http://web.raex.com/~gmurphy/



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 22 2003 - 15:38:57 EDT