Re: Clarification -- Re: Dawkins dissembles?

From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Fri Jul 18 2003 - 18:11:54 EDT

  • Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: Statistics"

    In a message dated 7/18/03 9:50:50 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
    hvantill@chartermi.net writes:

    > ? Or, is it, as some on this list seem to believe, a sinister and racially
    > specific evolutionary strategy that needs to be exposed?
    >
    > Howard Van Till
    >
    >
    >
    >

    Howard,

    Have you investigated any of the publications I mentioned? Have you asked for
    a copy of one of the papers I offered? Have you looked at Kevin MacDonald's
    web site? Have you ordered one of his books? C of C is 22.00 paperback, very
    doable.
    You say 'belief.' It is a matter of record that Judaism is a racially
    specific religion. This is common knowledge. I use an unfamiliar term coined by an
    evolutionary psychologist "evolutionary strategy." Why do you characterize it as
    sinister? If natural selection is a law and not a theory and the fittest
    survive, and the Jews have survived longer than any other people, why is it so
    far fetched that the Bible might actually conform to evolutionary science?
    Yes, I understand the implications of what I am saying. By calling the
    science sinister, you have started on the road to demonizing the science without
    objectively and professionally looking at it. I came here for Christian
    scientists. I want you to look at it objectively. If you characterize it to avoid it,
    that would be a terrible pity.

    rich faussette



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jul 18 2003 - 18:12:13 EDT