Re: Clarification -- Re: Dawkins dissembles?

From: Michael Roberts (michael.andrea.r@ukonline.co.uk)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 11:19:43 EDT

  • Next message: RFaussette@aol.com: "Re: asa-digest V1 #3468"

    Be careful Howard , you will get the wrath of the supersound descending on
    you for saying such things as I did. But I agree with you!

    Young earth creationism is the best argument for atheism I know.

    Michael

    >
    > 3. Yet another possibility: Intelligent persons who are well acquainted
    with
    > what the sciences have learned about the evolutionary history of the
    > universe see that the majority of Christians choose to ignore that
    > scientific evidence and cling to some form of episodic creationism
    > (entailing the rejection of the RFEP, and asserting that at least some
    life
    > forms required episodes of form-conferring supernatural intervention to
    > actualize). Given their informed judgment regarding the credibility of the
    > scientific concept of evolution, and given that the example set by the
    > majority of Christian theists entails a rejection of that informed
    judgment,
    > these intelligent and well-informed persons are less inclined to join with
    > the theists.
    >
    > There was a time when I joined the chorus of persons who were quick to
    > demonize those awful atheists as the epitome of stubborn arrogance and
    > extreme hubris. Perhaps it is now time to listen more respectfully to
    learn
    > what they themselves would say. It's just possible that their choices have
    > been made thoughtfully, humbly, and on the basis of warranted
    > considerations.
    >
    > Howard Van Till
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 12:00:39 EDT