From: Glenn Morton (glennmorton@entouch.net)
Date: Thu Jul 03 2003 - 09:49:58 EDT
Hi Richard, you wrote:
>-----Original Message-----
>From: asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu [mailto:asa-owner@lists.calvin.edu]On
>Behalf Of Richard McGough
>Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:16 AM
>>If you are correct, then I would challenge you to write a letter
>or article to a PEER-REVIEWED physics journal pointing out the
>simple and supposedly stupid error that Tegmark made. It would be
>good for you to go through the same peer review so that we can be
>sure that your criticisms are valid.
>
>I think I would prefer to have the issue settled here. To my
>understanding, many folks here are fully competent to judge such
>"small matters" as this. My criticism is not very involved - it
>would fit in a single paragraph in the letter to the editor. There
>is no need for what you suggest.
I would suggest that this is not very sporting. You demand that Tegmark get
peer-review but then demure for yourself. interesting.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jul 03 2003 - 09:50:19 EDT