From: RFaussette@aol.com
Date: Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:16:06 EST
In a message dated 3/19/03 11:18:35 AM Eastern Standard Time,
jarmstro@qwest.net writes:
> My "Mmm" post was not to ding you, ...just a thought stimulated by your
> post. Your post led me to think that this might be a reasonable question to
> ask to perhaps level the field a little when the "theory" card is played in
> creationist conversation. Regards JimA
>
>
I was not sensitive to your 'ding,' Jim but to the entire debacle of
creationism. Ham is right. Morality must be protected. He's wrong in his
method. Scientists who say the morality can be laxed or eliminated are
scientifically wrong since Judaism, has been studied as an evoluitonary
strategy and has been shown to proffer quality and quantity births and
subsequent material success based on that morality. If more people understood
that and understood ancient religious warfare, you'd understand "everything."
I would suggest spending NO time arguing with creationists, but instead
reading Kevin MacDonald's trilogy on Judaism
rich
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed Mar 19 2003 - 12:17:05 EST